Literature DB >> 30712708

Individualization of Clinical Target Volume Delineation Based on Stepwise Spread of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Outcome of More Than a Decade of Clinical Experience.

Nina N Sanford1, Jackson Lau1, Miranda B Lam1, Amy F Juliano2, Judith A Adams1, Saveli I Goldberg1, Hsiao-Ming Lu1, Yue C Lu1, Norbert J Liebsch1, Hugh D Curtin2, Annie W Chan3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiation-related toxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is common. There are no well-established guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) delineation with long-term follow-up. Current consensus continues to rely heavily on bony landmarks and fixed margins around the gross tumor volume (GTV), an approach used to define fields in the conventional 2- and 3-dimensional radiation therapy era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic NPC treated with definitive radiation therapy using a technique of CTV delineation based on individual tumor extent and the orderly stepwise pattern of tumor spread. Dosimetric comparisons were made between national protocol HN001 and our contouring strategies on a representative early- and advanced-stage NPC. The primary endpoints were patterns of failure and local control; secondary endpoints included regional control and survival, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2013, 73 patients (88% with stage 3-4 disease) were treated with median follow-up of 90 months for surviving patients. Median dose to GTV was 70 Gy. Four patients developed local recurrence and 1 patient developed regional recurrence. All locoregional recurrences occurred within the high-dose GTV. The 5-year local control, regional control, and overall survival was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%-98%), 99% (95% CI, 90%-100%), and 84% (95% CI, 73%-91%), respectively. Compared with HN001, our contouring strategy resulted in 62% and 36% reduction in CTV for T1 and T4 disease, respectively. In the T1 tumor, the reduction of doses to the contralateral parotid, optic nerve, and cochlea were 54%, 50%, 34% respectively. In the T4 case, there was a decrease of optic chiasm dose of 46% and contralateral optic nerve of 37%. There were 10 grade 3 toxicities. There was no grade 2 or higher xerostomia and no grade 4/5 toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our long-term experience with individualized CTV delineation based on stepwise patterns of spread results in excellent local control, with no recurrence outside the GTV.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30712708     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  A low dose of AZD8055 enhances radiosensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by activating autophagy and apoptosis.

Authors:  Lihong Chang; Zizhen Huang; Shuaixiang Li; Zhouzhou Yao; Hongwei Bao; Zhiyuan Wang; Xia Li; Xiaohong Chen; Jiancong Huang; Gehua Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Variations of Clinical Target Volume Delineation for Primary Site of Nasopharyngeal Cancer Among Five Centers in China.

Authors:  Shichuan Zhang; Shuang Yang; Peng Xu; Yun Xu; Guanqun Zhou; Xiaomin Ou; Runye Wu; Mei Lan; Davide Fontanarosa; Jason Dowling; Xiaoshen Wang; Shaojun Lin; Jun-Lin Yi; Ying Sun; Chaosu Hu; Jinyi Lang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  A novel dosimetric metrics-based risk model to predict local recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Wenjun Liao; Jinlan He; Zijian Liu; Maolang Tian; Jiangping Yang; Jiaqi Han; Jianghong Xiao
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus tomotherapy for late T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Qian Chen; Lingwei Tang; Zhe Zhu; Liangfang Shen; Shan Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Is a high-risk clinical target volume required? Evaluation of the dosimetric feasibility based on T staging.

Authors:  Xingxing Yuan; Chao Yan; Shiyi Peng; Zhiping Chen; Tianzhu Lu; Qiaoying Gong; Yang Qiu; Wenming Xiong; Fenghua Ao; Guoqing Li; Jingao Li; Ziwei Tu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wai Tong Ng; Barton But; Charlene H L Wong; Cheuk-Wai Choi; Melvin L K Chua; Pierre Blanchard; Anne W M Lee
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-08-23

7.  A Systematic Review of Proton Therapy for the Management of Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Sarin Kitpanit; Marina Chilov; Johannes A Langendijk; Jiade Lu; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25

8.  Analysis of Clinical Target Volume Delineation in Local-regional Failure of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaojing Yang; Hanru Ren; Weiwei Yu; Xiulong Zhang; Yi Sun; Yuhui Shao; Lihua Zhang; Hongling Li; Xinmiao Yang; Jie Fu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Tetrandrine sensitizes nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to irradiation by inducing autophagy and inhibiting MEK/ERK pathway.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Zhouzhou Yao; Xiaoping Lai; Hongwei Bao; Yue Li; Shuaixiang Li; Lihong Chang; Gehua Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Characteristics of locoregional extension of unilateral nasopharyngeal carcinoma and suggestions for clinical target volume delineation.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Lin Zhang; Qian He; Feiping Li; Hongzhi Ma; Yujuan Zhou; Hui Wang; Yaqian Han
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.