Literature DB >> 30712689

Comparison of root resorption after bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with the use of microtomography.

Mucahid Yildirim1, Mehmet Akin2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Root resorption was compared between bone-borne and tooth tissue-borne rapid maxillary expansion patients with the use of microtomography.
METHODS: The study included 20 patients (ages 11-16 years) requiring fixed orthodontic treatment who underwent extraction of their first premolars after rapid maxillary expansion with the use of modified appliances. One side of the appliance covered the teeth with acrylic, while the other side was fixed to the palatal bone by means of a miniscrew. After 3 months' retention, the appliance was removed and teeth were extracted and examined with the use of microtomography.
RESULTS: When the apical, middle, and cervical thirds, as well as the buccal and lingual sides, were compared, the volume loss was significantly higher in the tooth tissue-borne group than in the bone-borne group (P <0.01). The least volume loss occurred on the cervical third lingual surface in the tooth tissue-borne group and on the middle third buccal surface in the bone-borne group. In the former group, least resorption occurred on the cervical third and highest resorption on the buccal side. In the latter group, surfaces showed no significant changes.
CONCLUSIONS: More root resorption occurred in the tooth tissue-borne group, mostly in the apical and middle thirds. The amount of resorption on the buccal surface was higher than that on the lingual surface.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30712689     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Influence of different types of rapid maxillary expansion on root resorption: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kai Xia; Wen-Tian Sun; Li-Yuan Yu; Jun Liu
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-01

2.  Does the rhythm and appliance type of rapid maxillary expansion have an effect on root resorption?

Authors:  Sıddık Malkoç; Rukiye Alçin; Aslıhan Uzel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  [Evaluation of root resorption after surgical orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion by three-dimensional volumetric measurement with cone-beam CT].

Authors:  J Gao; H M Lv; H M Ma; Y J Zhao; X T Li
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 4.  Rapid Maxillary Expansion on the Adolescent Patient: Systematic Review and Case Report.

Authors:  Alessio Danilo Inchingolo; Irene Ferrara; Fabio Viapiano; Anna Netti; Merigrazia Campanelli; Silvio Buongiorno; Giulia Latini; Vincenzo Carpentiere; Anna Maria Ciocia; Sabino Ceci; Assunta Patano; Fabio Piras; Filippo Cardarelli; Damiano Nemore; Giuseppina Malcangi; Angela Di Noia; Antonio Mancini; Angelo Michele Inchingolo; Grazia Marinelli; Biagio Rapone; Ioana Roxana Bordea; Antonio Scarano; Felice Lorusso; Daniela Di Venere; Francesco Inchingolo; Gianna Dipalma
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  Pain Reduction during Rapid Palatal Expansion Due to LED Photobiomodulation Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gianluigi Caccianiga; Paolo Caccianiga; Marco Baldoni; Antonino Lo Giudice; Letizia Perillo; Nicolò Moretti; Saverio Ceraulo
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Does mini-implant-supported rapid maxillary expansion cause less root resorption than traditional approaches? A micro-computed tomography study.

Authors:  Rukiye Alcin; Siddik Malkoç
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.