Literature DB >> 30712687

Effectiveness of part-time vs full-time wear protocols of Twin-block appliance on dental and skeletal changes: A randomized controlled trial.

Jeet Parekh1, Kate Counihan1, Padhraig S Fleming1, Nikolaos Pandis2, Pratik K Sharma3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this 2-arm parallel study was to compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal changes achieved with Twin-block appliance therapy prescribed on either a part- or full-time basis for 12 months.
METHODS: Sixty-two 10- to 14-year-old patients were randomly allocated to either full-time (FT, 22 hours daily) or part-time (PT, 12 hours daily) wear of a modified Twin-block appliance. Participants were recruited from the Institute of Dentistry, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom, and recalled at 6- to 8-week intervals. Electronic randomization was undertaken, with group allocation concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes. The outcome assessor was blinded; however, it was not feasible to blind either operator or patients. Study models and cephalograms were taken at baseline and after 12 months of treatment.
RESULTS: Data from 55 of the 62 participants were analyzed. Overjets were reduced by 7 mm (SD, 2.92) in the PT group and 6.5 mm (SD, 2.62) in the FT group, with no statistical difference between the groups (P = 0.587; 95% CI, -1.01, 1.78). Similarly, no clinical or statistical differences were noted for skeletal changes: ANB angle (PT, -1.51°; FT, -1.25°; P = 0.828; 95% CI, -0.68, 0.849), pogonion-sella vertical (PT, 3.25 mm; FT, 3.35 mm) or A-sella vertical (PT, 1.28 mm; FT, 1.06 mm). Mean wear durations were 8.78 hours a day in the PT group and 12.38 hours in the FT group.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in either dental or skeletal changes achieved with PT or FT wear of a Twin-block appliance over 12 months. Less onerous PT wear regimens may therefore be a viable alternative to FT wear of removable functional appliances. REGISTRATION: NCT02190630. PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30712687     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  3 in total

1.  Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion.

Authors:  Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus; Burak Kale
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-09

2.  Does daily wear time of Twin Block reliably predict its efficiency of class II treatment?

Authors:  Michal Sarul; Marek Nahajowski; Grzegorz Gawin; Joanna Antoszewska-Smith
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marek Nahajowski; Joanna Lis; Michał Sarul
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.607

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.