Literature DB >> 30712641

Long-Term Survival Analysis and Outcomes of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.

João V Novaretti1, Neel K Patel2, Jayson Lian3, Ravi Vaswani2, Darren de Sa2, Alan Getgood4, Volker Musahl5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term survivorship rates and functional outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) in patients with minimum 10-year postoperative follow-up.
METHODS: Two reviewers independently searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed from database inception for literature related to MAT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Data are reported in a narrative summary fashion with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 658 patients and 688 MATs were included. Mean age of patients was 33.1 years (range 14-66), of whom 63% were male. Mean survivorship rates were 73.5% at 10-year and 60.3% at 15-year follow-up, with 2 studies reporting 19- and 24-year survivorship of 50% and 15.1%, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Lysholm scores ranged from 36 to 60.5 and 61 to 75, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Tegner scores ranged from 1 to 3 and 2.5 to 4.6, respectively. Postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subset scores were as follows: Pain: 61.6 to 76.3; Symptoms: 57.9 to 61.8; Function in Daily Living: 68.5 to 79.9; Sport and Recreation: 33.9 to 49.3; Quality of Life: 37.3 to 45.9. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores ranged from 46 to 77. Regarding surgical technique, 194 MAT bone-fixation technique (53.8%) and 165 MAT suture-only fixation techniques (46.2%) were reported. The most common type of allograft used was cryopreserved (54.5% of the allografts). The most frequent concomitant procedures performed with MAT were to address chondral (20.8% of the cases) and ligament injuries (12.4% of the cases), and realignment procedures (9.4% of the cases). The most common complications observed that were not directly related to concomitant procedures were meniscal allograft partial tears (11.1%), arthrofibrosis (3.6%), and infection (2.0%). Several criteria were used among studies to define failure of MAT, the most common parameters being removal of meniscal allograft (8/11 studies) and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (7/11 studies).
CONCLUSIONS: MAT can yield good long-term survivorship rates, with 73.5% and 60.3% of allografts remaining functional after 10 and 15 years, respectively. Functional outcomes 10 years after MAT were fair and improved compared with preoperative scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30712641     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  High-grade preoperative osteoarthritis of the index compartment is a major predictor of meniscal allograft failure.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Nyaluma N Wagala; Jonathan D Hughes; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Variations of cross-sectional meniscal morphology between similar-sized menisci: implications on donor selection for meniscal allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Melih Unal; Cemil Aktan; Ali Levent; Mustafa Cetin; Ozkan Kose; Levent Sarikcioglu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Strength of interference screw fixation of meniscus prosthesis matches native meniscus attachments.

Authors:  M K Bartolo; E Provaggi; K K Athwal; S Newman; M A Accardi; D Dini; A Williams; A A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.114

4.  CORR Insights®: Likelihood of Return to Duty Is Low After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in an Active-duty Military Population.

Authors:  Jan M K Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Soft-Tissue Fixation Including the Anterior Intermeniscal Ligament.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Lukasz Lipinski; Nicolas Pujol
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-12-24

6.  Increased MRI Signal Intensity of Allografts in the Midterm Period After Meniscal Allograft Transplant: An Evaluation of Clinical Significance According to Location and Morphology.

Authors:  Jun-Gu Park; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Bum-Sik Lee; Sang-Min Lee; Ju-Ho Song
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-26

7.  In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Soft Tissue Fixation.

Authors:  Luca Macchiarola; Stefano Di Paolo; Alberto Grassi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Ilaria Cucurnia; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 8.  An Up-to-Date Review of the Meniscus Literature: A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jason B Smoak; John R Matthews; Amrit V Vinod; Melissa A Kluczynski; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-09

9.  Editorial Commentary: It Takes Two to Tango: The Shared Decision of Return to Sport After Meniscal Transplantation.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 10.  Prognostic Factors to Determine Survivorship of Meniscal Allograft Transplant: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ding-Yu Wang; Cassandra A Lee; Yan-Zhang Li; Bo Zhang; Nan Li; Dong Jiang; Jia-Kuo Yu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.