Literature DB >> 30712197

Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.

Zhi-Hua Liu1, Kun Wang2, Dan-Yi Lin1, Jie Xu1, Jie Chen1, Xiao-Yu Long1, Yan Ge1, Xin-Lan Luo1, Ke-Ping Zhang1, Yan-Hui Liu1, Fang-Ping Xu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, ERBB2) is a valuable prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential in selecting the patients with invasive breast cancer who will likely response to HER2-targeted therapies. Some major modifications in the diagnostic recommendation for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have been made in the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologist (CAP) guideline. According to the revised guideline, concomitant IHC assays are required to arrive at the most accurate HER2 status designation after HER2 FISH equivocal results; however, little is known about its influence on the clinical practice of pathologist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the revised 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on the HER2 status designation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the HER2 FISH testing results from 2233 cases of invasive breast cancer between January 2014 and December 2017. Concomitant immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same tissue blocks that were used for the FISH testing.
RESULTS: Compared to the 2013 guidelines, the HER2 status in 183 (8.2%) cases were re-defined when reassessed by the 2018 guidelines. Among these 183 cases, 175 equivocal cases according to the 2013 guideline were re-defined as HER2 negative (n = 173) or HER2 positive (n = 2). Eight previously classified as HER2 positive cases were converted to negative in the 2018 scheme, all of which were with HER2 IHC scores of 1+ or 2+. The number of cases in the negative category was 1705 according to the 2018 guidelines as opposed to 1524 by the 2013 guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: The updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines eliminated the FISH equivocal category, which can be attributed to reflex HER2 IHC, and partly ease the dilemma for clinical practice. Reflex IHC for FISH equivocal cases is of prime importance; furthermore, HER2 FISH results were converted from positivity to negativity based on the concomitant IHC results in a small percentage of cases. In all, implementation of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines provides much clearer instructions and recommendations for the HER2 status designation, and thus reduces the risk of misdiagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASCO/CAP guidelines; Breast cancer; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; HER2; Immunohistochemistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30712197     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05148-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  10 in total

Review 1.  Applying the New Guidelines of HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Huina Zhang; Ioana Moisini; Rana M Ajabnoor; Bradley M Turner; David G Hicks
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Min Chong Kim; Su Hwan Kang; Jung Eun Choi; Young Kyung Bae
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

Review 3.  Targeted therapeutic options and future perspectives for HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jiani Wang; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Wei Ding; Ke Sun; Xiaoling Wang; Liming Xu; Xiaodong Teng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Preliminary study on discriminating HER2 2+ amplification status of breast cancers based on texture features semi-automatically derived from pre-, post-contrast, and subtraction images of DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Lirong Song; Hecheng Lu; Jiandong Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation.

Authors:  Soomin Ahn; Ji Won Woo; Kyoungyul Lee; So Yeon Park
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-06

Review 7.  Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.

Authors:  James Crespo; Hongxia Sun; Jimin Wu; Qing-Qing Ding; Guilin Tang; Melissa K Robinson; Hui Chen; Aysegul A Sahin; Bora Lim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Aberrant ALOX5 Activation Correlates with HER2 Status and Mediates Breast Cancer Biological Activities through Multiple Mechanisms.

Authors:  Xiao Zhou; Yi Jiang; Qiuyun Li; Zhen Huang; Huawei Yang; Changyuan Wei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Temporal Heterogeneity of HER2 Expression and Spatial Heterogeneity of 18F-FDG Uptake Predicts Treatment Outcome of Pyrotinib in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chengcheng Gong; Cheng Liu; Zhonghua Tao; Jian Zhang; Leiping Wang; Jun Cao; Yannan Zhao; Yizhao Xie; Xichun Hu; Zhongyi Yang; Biyun Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Quantification of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 by Immunopeptide Enrichment and Targeted Mass Spectrometry in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded and Frozen Breast Cancer Tissues.

Authors:  Jacob J Kennedy; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Laura C Kennedy; Dustin E Bosch; Melissa L Lerch; Regine M Schoenherr; Lei Zhao; ChenWei Lin; Shrabanti Chowdhury; Mark R Kilgore; Kimberly H Allison; Pei Wang; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey Stuart Baird; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 12.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.