Doruk Akgün1, Justus Bürger2, Matthias Pumberger3, Michael Putzier1. 1. Spine Department, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. 2. Charité University Medicine Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. 3. Spine Department, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. matthias.pumberger@charite.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: C-reactive protein (CRP) has been shown to be a powerful parameter for detecting acute postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, little data are available on the performance of CRP in the diagnosis of delayed PSII. The aim of the current study was therefore to establish cutoff values for diagnosing delayed infection based on serum CRP. METHODS: All patients who underwent a revision surgery after instrumented spinal fusion from January 2013 through January 2016 were included. Demographic data, laboratory values, type of infection (including microbiological and pathological results), comorbidities and clinical manifestation were collected. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria, proposed to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection, were used to diagnose PSII. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were included. PSII was diagnosed in 61 patients, representing 24% of the study cohort. There was a significant difference in serum CRP levels between septic and aseptic cohorts (19.3 vs. 4.8 mg/l, p < 0.001). However, 26 patients (43%) from the PSII group had a normal (< 5 mg/l) serum CRP level prior to revision surgery. According to the ROC curve, a serum CRP threshold of 4.05 mg/l had a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 68%. The most common isolated microorganism was Propionibacterium spp. followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Serum CRP showed low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of delayed PSII, even after applying cutoffs optimized by using receiver operating curve analysis, because of the high incidence of low-virulent pathogens. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE:C-reactive protein (CRP) has been shown to be a powerful parameter for detecting acute postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, little data are available on the performance of CRP in the diagnosis of delayed PSII. The aim of the current study was therefore to establish cutoff values for diagnosing delayed infection based on serum CRP. METHODS: All patients who underwent a revision surgery after instrumented spinal fusion from January 2013 through January 2016 were included. Demographic data, laboratory values, type of infection (including microbiological and pathological results), comorbidities and clinical manifestation were collected. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria, proposed to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection, were used to diagnose PSII. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were included. PSII was diagnosed in 61 patients, representing 24% of the study cohort. There was a significant difference in serum CRP levels between septic and aseptic cohorts (19.3 vs. 4.8 mg/l, p < 0.001). However, 26 patients (43%) from the PSII group had a normal (< 5 mg/l) serum CRP level prior to revision surgery. According to the ROC curve, a serum CRP threshold of 4.05 mg/l had a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 68%. The most common isolated microorganism was Propionibacterium spp. followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Serum CRP showed low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of delayed PSII, even after applying cutoffs optimized by using receiver operating curve analysis, because of the high incidence of low-virulent pathogens. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Entities:
Keywords:
CRP; Diagnostic; Infection; Posterior fusion; Revision surgery; Spine surgery
Authors: James M Mok; Murat Pekmezci; Samantha L Piper; Erin Boyd; Sigurd H Berven; Shane Burch; Vedat Deviren; Bobby Tay; Serena S Hu Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Pascale Bémer; S Corvec; S Tariel; N Asseray; D Boutoille; C Langlois; B Tequi; H Drugeon; N Passuti; S Touchais Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Iona Collins; James Wilson-MacDonald; George Chami; Will Burgoyne; P Vinayakam; Tony Berendt; Jeremy Fairbank Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-12-13 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Daniel Karczewski; Klaus J Schnake; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich Spiegl; Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Matthias Pumberger Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2021-06-21