Literature DB >> 30711613

Ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of Gram-positive endocarditis: CAPTURE study experience.

Christopher J Destache1, David J Guervil2, Keith S Kaye3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical experience of ceftaroline fosamil (CPT-F) therapy for Gram-positive infective endocarditis is reported from CAPTURE, a retrospective study conducted in the USA.
METHODS: Data, including patient demographics, medical history, risk factors, microbiological aetiology and clinical outcomes, were collected by review of patient charts between September 2013 and February 2015.
RESULTS: Patients (n=55) with Gram-positive endocarditis were treated with CPT-F. The most common risk factors were intravascular devices (43.6%), diabetes mellitus (40.0%) and injection drug use (38.2%). The most commonly isolated pathogens were meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; 80%), meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA; 7.3%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (7.3%). CPT-F was given as first-line therapy in 7.3% of patients and as second-line or later therapy in 92.7% of patients, and as monotherapy in 41.8% of patients and as concurrent therapy in 58.2% of patients. Clinical success was observed in 82.6% (19/23) of patients treated with CPT-F as monotherapy. In patients treated with CPT-F as first-line therapy or second-line or later therapy, 75.0% (3/4) and 70.6% (36/51) achieved success, respectively. Clinical success was observed in 77.3% (34/44) of patients with MRSA and 25% (1/4) of patients with MSSA. Two patients discontinued treatment with CPT-F due to an adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS: CPT-F treatment was associated with a high rate of clinical success in patients with Gram-positive infective endocarditis, including those with risk factors and infections caused by MRSA. A high rate of clinical success was observed in patients treated with CPT-F used as first- line therapy or second-line or later therapy, or as monotherapy or in combination with other antibiotics.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAPTURE study; Ceftaroline fosamil; Gram-positive endocarditis; Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30711613     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  4 in total

1.  Is Daptomycin plus Ceftaroline the Way To Go for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia?

Authors:  Keith S Kaye; Twisha Patel; George Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Incidence and risk factors for mortality in patients treated with combined ceftaroline for Gram-positive infective endocarditis.

Authors:  D Brandariz-Núñez; J Suanzes; J M Gutiérrez-Urbón; C Fernández-Oliveira; L Margusino; I Martín-Herranz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and β-Lactam Cross-Reactivity.

Authors:  Saira B Chaudhry; Michael P Veve; Jamie L Wagner
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-29

4.  Multicenter Cohort of Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Receiving Daptomycin Plus Ceftaroline Compared With Other MRSA Treatments.

Authors:  Erin K McCreary; Ravina Kullar; Matthew Geriak; Evan J Zasowski; Khulood Rizvi; Lucas T Schulz; Krista Ouellette; Logan Vasina; Fadi Haddad; Michael J Rybak; Marcus J Zervos; George Sakoulas; Warren E Rose
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.835

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.