Literature DB >> 30711453

Ensembles, dynamics, and cell types: Revisiting the statistical mechanics perspective on cellular regulation.

Stefan Bornholdt1, Stuart Kauffman2.   

Abstract

Genetic regulatory networks control ontogeny. For fifty years Boolean networks have served as models of such systems, ranging from ensembles of random Boolean networks as models for generic properties of gene regulation to working dynamical models of a growing number of sub-networks of real cells. At the same time, their statistical mechanics has been thoroughly studied. Here we recapitulate their original motivation in the context of current theoretical and empirical research. We discuss ensembles of random Boolean networks whose dynamical attractors model cell types. A sub-ensemble is the critical ensemble. There is now strong evidence that genetic regulatory networks are dynamically critical, and that evolution is exploring the critical sub-ensemble. The generic properties of this sub-ensemble predict essential features of cell differentiation. In particular, the number of attractors in such networks scales as the DNA content raised to the 0.63 power. Data on the number of cell types as a function of the DNA content per cell shows a scaling relationship of 0.88. Thus, the theory correctly predicts a power law relationship between the number of cell types and the DNA contents per cell, and a comparable slope. We discuss these new scaling values and show prospects for new research lines for Boolean networks as a base model for systems biology.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Boolean networks; Cell differentiation; Criticality; Genetic regulatory networks; Scaling laws

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30711453     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  5 in total

1.  Regulatory Dynamics of Cell Differentiation Revealed by True Time Series From Multinucleate Single Cells.

Authors:  Anna Pretschner; Sophie Pabel; Markus Haas; Monika Heiner; Wolfgang Marwan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  A model for the intrinsic limit of cancer therapy: Duality of treatment-induced cell death and treatment-induced stemness.

Authors:  Erin Angelini; Yue Wang; Joseph Xu Zhou; Hong Qian; Sui Huang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Drug Research Meets Network Science: Where Are We?

Authors:  Maurizio Recanatini; Chiara Cabrelle
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Effective connectivity determines the critical dynamics of biochemical networks.

Authors:  Santosh Manicka; Manuel Marques-Pita; Luis M Rocha
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Attractor-Specific and Common Expression Values in Random Boolean Network Models (with a Preliminary Look at Single-Cell Data).

Authors:  Marco Villani; Gianluca D'Addese; Stuart A Kauffman; Roberto Serra
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.