Literature DB >> 30711411

The value of unsolicited online data in drug policy research.

Oskar Enghoff1, Judith Aldridge2.   

Abstract

We alert readers to the value of using unsolicited online data in drug policy research by highlighting web-based content relevant to drug policy generated by distinct types of actor: people who consume, supply or produce illicit drugs, online news websites and state or civil society organisations. These actors leave 'digital traces' across a range of internet platforms, and these traces become available to researchers to use as data - although they have not been solicited by researchers, and so have not been created specifically to fulfil the aims of research projects. This particular type of data entails certain strengths, limitations and ethical challenges, and we aim to assist researchers in understanding these by drawing on selected examples of published research using unsolicited online data that have generated valuable drug policy insights not possible using other traditional data sources. We argue for the continued and increased importance of using unsolicited online data so that drug policy scholarship keep pace with recent developments in the global landscape of drug policies and illicit drug practices.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Online data; Online markets; Online methods; Unsolicited data

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30711411     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  8 in total

1.  Frequently asked questions about dabbing concentrates in online cannabis community discussion forums.

Authors:  Meredith C Meacham; Shim Roh; Jamie Suki Chang; Danielle E Ramo
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-08-07

2.  Ordinary people, criminals, addicts and recreational users: Swedish court of law descriptions of persons sentenced for online drug purchases.

Authors:  Fredrik Tiberg; Johan Nordgren
Journal:  Nordisk Alkohol Nark       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Social media surveillance for perceived therapeutic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) products.

Authors:  Tung Tran; Ramakanth Kavuluru
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-02-21

4.  A qualitative descriptive analysis of effects of psychedelic phenethylamines and tryptamines.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Patricia Acosta
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  "How will I get my next week's script?" Reactions of Reddit opioid forum users to changes in treatment access in the early months of the coronavirus pandemic.

Authors:  Noa Krawczyk; Amanda M Bunting; David Frank; Joshua Arshonsky; Yuanqi Gu; Samuel R Friedman; Marie A Bragg
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2021-02-06

6.  Analyzing user-generated content using natural language processing: a case study of public satisfaction with healthcare systems.

Authors:  Anna Ruelens
Journal:  J Comput Soc Sci       Date:  2021-10-29

7.  "I got a bunch of weed to help me through the withdrawals": Naturalistic cannabis use reported in online opioid and opioid recovery community discussion forums.

Authors:  Meredith C Meacham; Alicia L Nobles; D Andrew Tompkins; Johannes Thrul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A focused netnographic study exploring experiences associated with counterfeit and contaminated anabolic-androgenic steroids.

Authors:  Evelyn Frude; Fiona H McKay; Matthew Dunn
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2020-06-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.