Literature DB >> 30710147

Exome sequencing in clinical settings: preferences and experiences of parents of children with rare diseases (SEQUAPRE study).

Aline Chassagne1,2,3, Aurore Pélissier3,4, Françoise Houdayer5, Elodie Cretin2,3, Elodie Gautier6, Dominique Salvi5, Sarah Kidri5, Aurélie Godard1,2, Christel Thauvin-Robinet3,6, Alice Masurel6, Daphné Lehalle6, Nolwenn Jean-Marçais6, Julien Thevenon6, Gaetan Lesca5, Audrey Putoux5, Marie-Pierre Cordier5, Sophie Dupuis-Girod5, Marianne Till5, Yannis Duffourd3, Jean-Baptiste Rivière3, Lorraine Joly6, Christine Juif6, Olivier Putois7, Pierre Ancet8, Anne-Sophie Lapointe9, Paulette Morin9, Patrick Edery5, Massimiliano Rossi5, Damien Sanlaville5, Sophie Béjean4, Christine Peyron4, Laurence Faivre10,11.   

Abstract

Exome sequencing (ES) has revolutionized diagnostic procedures in medical genetics, particularly for developmental diseases. The variety and complexity of the information produced has raised issues regarding its use in a clinical setting. Of particular interest are patients' expectations regarding the information disclosed, the accompaniment provided, and the value patients place on these. To explore these issues in parents of children with developmental disorders and no diagnosis with known etiology, a multidisciplinary group of researchers from social and behavioral sciences and patient organizations conducted a mixed-methodology study (quantitative and qualitative) in two centers of expertise for rare diseases in France. The quantitative study aimed to determine the preferences of 513 parents regarding the disclosure of ES results. It showed that parents wished to have exhaustive information, including variants of unknown significance possibly linked to their child's disorder and secondary findings. This desire for information could be a strategy to maximize the chances of obtaining a diagnosis. The qualitative study aimed to understand the expectations and reactions of 57 parents interviewed just after the return of ES results. In-depth analysis showed that parents had ambivalent feelings about the findings whatever the results returned. The contrasting results from these studies raise questions about the value of the information provided and parents' high expectations regarding the results. The nature of parental expectations has emerged as an important topic in efforts to optimize accompaniment and support for families during the informed decision-making process and after disclosure of the results in an overall context of uncertainty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30710147      PMCID: PMC6461801          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0332-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  5 in total

1.  Exome Sequencing and Molecular Diagnosis.

Authors:  William D Graf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Hannah Hoban; Simon Outram; Astrid N Zamora; Flavia Chen; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Beatriz Anguiano; Matthew Norstad; Tiffany Yip; Billie Lianoglou; Teresa N Sparks; Mary E Norton; Barbara A Koenig; Anne M Slavotinek; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.864

Review 3.  Clinical utility of genomic sequencing: a measurement toolkit.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; David Dimmock; David Bick; John W Belmont; Robert C Green; Brendan Lanpher; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Roberto Mendoza; Shashi Kulkarni; Megan E Grove; Stacie L Taylor; Euan Ashley
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 8.617

4.  Assessing women's preferences towards tests that may reveal uncertain results from prenatal genomic testing: Development of attributes for a discrete choice experiment, using a mixed-methods design.

Authors:  Jennifer Hammond; Jasmijn E Klapwijk; Sam Riedijk; Stina Lou; Kelly E Ormond; Ida Vogel; Lisa Hui; Emma-Jane Sziepe; James Buchanan; Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren; Maria Johansson Soller; Eleanor Harding; Melissa Hill; Celine Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Continuing the sequence? Towards an economic evaluation of whole genome sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases in Scotland.

Authors:  Michael Abbott; Lynda McKenzie; Blanca Viridiana Guizar Moran; Sebastian Heidenreich; Rodolfo Hernández; Lynne Hocking-Mennie; Caroline Clark; Joana Gomes; Anne Lampe; David Baty; Ruth McGowan; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Mandy Ryan
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-08-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.