Literature DB >> 30709947

The OMERACT Core Domain Set for Clinical Trials of Shoulder Disorders.

Sofia Ramiro1,2, Matthew J Page3,4, Samuel L Whittle3,4, Hsiaomin Huang3,4, Arianne P Verhagen3,4, Dorcas E Beaton3,4, Pamela Richards3,4, Marieke Voshaar3,4, Beverley Shea3,4, Danielle A van der Windt3,4, Christian Kopkow3,4, Mario Lenza3,4, Nitin B Jain3,4, Bethan Richards3,4, Catherine Hill3,4, Tiffany K Gill3,4, Bart Koes3,4, Nadine E Foster3,4, Philip G Conaghan3,4, Toby Smith3,4, Peter Malliaras3,4, Yngve Roe3,4, Joel J Gagnier3,4, Rachelle Buchbinder3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reach consensus on the core domains to be included in a core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 Core Domain Set process.
METHODS: At OMERACT 2018, the OMERACT Shoulder Working Group conducted a workshop that presented the OMERACT 2016 preliminary core domain set and its rationale based upon a systematic review of domains measured in shoulder trials and international Delphi sessions involving patients, clinicians, and researchers, as well as a new systematic review of qualitative studies on the experiences of people with shoulder disorders. After discussions in breakout groups, the OMERACT core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders was presented for endorsement by OMERACT 2018 participants.
RESULTS: The qualitative review (n = 8) identified all domains included in the preliminary core set. An additional domain, cognitive dysfunction, was also identified, but confidence that this represents a core domain was very low. The core domain set that was endorsed by the OMERACT participants, with 71% agreement, includes 4 "mandatory" trial domains: pain, function, patient global - shoulder, and adverse events including death; and 4 "important but optional" domains: participation (recreation/work), sleep, emotional well-being, and condition-specific pathophysiological manifestations. Cognitive dysfunction was voted out of the core domain set.
CONCLUSION: OMERACT 2018 delegates endorsed a core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders. The next step includes identification of a core outcome measurement set that passes the OMERACT 2.1 Filter for measuring each domain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CORE OUTCOME SET; OMERACT; OUTCOME MEASUREMENT; SHOULDER; TRIALS

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30709947     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  9 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided glucocorticoid injection versus injection without image guidance for shoulder pain.

Authors:  Joshua Zadro; Adam Rischin; Renea V Johnston; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 2.  Frozen shoulder.

Authors:  Neal L Millar; Adam Meakins; Filip Struyf; Elaine Willmore; Abigail L Campbell; Paul D Kirwan; Moeed Akbar; Laura Moore; Jonathan C Ronquillo; George A C Murrell; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 65.038

3.  Tailored exercise and manual therapy versus standardised exercise for patients with shoulder subacromial pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial).

Authors:  Daniel C Ribeiro; Zohreh Jafarian Tangrood; Ross Wilson; Gisela Sole; J Haxby Abbott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Adherence to self-managed exercises for patients with persistent subacromial pain: the Ad-Shoulder feasibility study.

Authors:  Daniel H Major; Margreth Grotle; Chris Littlewood; Jens Ivar Brox; Dagfinn Matre; Heidi V Gallet; Yngve Røe
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of a corticosteroid injection versus exercise therapy for shoulder pain in general practice: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (SIX Study).

Authors:  Pieter F van Doorn; Evelien I T de Schepper; Dieuwke Schiphof; Ramon P G Ottenheijm; Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf; Marc A Koopmanschap; John M van Ochten; Danielle A van der Windt; Patrick J E Bindels; Bart W Koes; Jos Runhaar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Synthesizing Core Outcome Sets for outcomes research in cohort studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Erica Musgrove; Loretta Gasparini; Katie McBain; Susan A Clifford; Simon A Carter; Helena Teede; Melissa Wake
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.953

7.  Effectiveness of an expert assessment and individualised treatment compared with a minimal home-based exercise program in women with late-term shoulder impairments after primary breast cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kim Michéle Feder; Hans Bjarke Rahr; Marianne Djernes Lautrup; Heidi Klakk Egebæk; Robin Christensen; Kim Gordon Ingwersen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 8.  Manipulation under Anesthesia versus Non-Surgical Treatment for Patients with Frozen Shoulder Contracture Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mattia Salomon; Chiara Pastore; Filippo Maselli; Mauro Di Bari; Raffaello Pellegrino; Fabrizio Brindisino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Co-producing a multi-stakeholder Core Outcome Set for distal Tibia and Ankle fractures (COSTA): a study protocol.

Authors:  Nathan A Pearson; Elizabeth Tutton; Alexander Joeris; Stephen Gwilym; Richard Grant; David J Keene; Kirstie L Haywood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.