| Literature DB >> 30709412 |
Muhammad Irfan Malik1, Mohsin Nawaz1, Ibrahim A Hassan1, Houshuang Zhang1, Haiyan Gong1, Jie Cao1, Yongzhi Zhou1, Jinlin Zhou2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tick saliva contains many bioactive molecules that are involved in attachment to the host, blood-feeding and transmission of pathogens. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short non-coding RNAs with a length of 19-24 nucleotides. They act as regulators of gene expression by binding to their target mRNA at the post-transcriptional level and control a variety of cellular functions, including regulation of growth, metabolism and development. The detection and characterizations of miRNAs from tick saliva may help explain the molecular mechanisms involved in the interaction between ticks, pathogens and hosts. They may also contribute to the discovery of vaccines, which can control ticks and the pathogens they transmit.Entities:
Keywords: Haemaphysalis longicornis; Saliva; miR-375; miRNAs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30709412 PMCID: PMC6359829 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3318-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Summary of sequence data and alignment statistics of tags to reference genome
| Sequence data and alignment statistics | Total tag counts |
|---|---|
| Summary of sequence data | |
| Raw tag count | 19,680,704 |
| Clean tag count | 17,439,606 |
| Percentage (%) | 88.61 |
| Alignment statistics of tags align to reference genome | |
| Total tag | 17,439,606 |
| Mapped tag | 66,796 |
| Percentage (%) | 0.38 |
Fig. 1Length distribution of small RNA (sRNA). The X-axis shows the length of sRNA and the Y-axis shows the percentage of the number of sRNA with a specific length
Fig. 2Proportion of different kinds of small RNA (sRNA). To make sure every unique small RNA mapped to only one annotation, we followed the following priority rule: miRNA > piRNA > snoRNA > Rfam > other RNA
Ten most abundant miRNAs in the saliva and salivary gland of fed adult ticks
| Saliva | Count | Salivary gland | Count |
|---|---|---|---|
| miR-100_2 | 415,333 | miR-1 | 445,787 |
| miR-315 | 309,466 | miR-375 | 376,709 |
| miR-184_1 | 275,170 | miR-184 | 154,004 |
| miR-100-5p_2 | 140,614 | miR-263a | 79,829 |
| miR-5307 | 119,499 | Bantam | 74,385 |
| miR-184-3p_3 | 109,545 | miR-739 | 53,501 |
| Let-7-5p_6 | 33,924 | miR-317 | 39,473 |
| miR-71_5 | 32,787 | Let-7 | 25,833 |
| miR-1-3p_6 | 22,022 | miR-275 | 15,620 |
| miR-10-5p_2 | 10,100 | miR-183 | 868 |
Fig. 3Secondary structure of candidate miRNA was predicted based on maximum free energy (MFE) structure and the sequence is marked with a red line
Fig. 4Relative expression of miR-375 in different stages of life-cycle (a) and in different tissues (b) of unfed and fed adult H. longicornis tick. Data represent three biological replicates with three technical replicates and are shown as mean ± SEM
Fig. 5The miR-375 inhibition by Ant-375. Data represent three biological replicates with three technical replicates and are shown as mean ± SEM
Fig. 6Silencing of miR-375 affects the egg number (a) and hatching in Ant-375, Ms-Ant and non-injected ticks (b)
Feeding periods and oviposition in different groups
| Group | Feeding period (days) | Oviposition (days) |
|---|---|---|
| Non-injected | 6.16 | 26.0 ± 0.7078 |
| Ms-Ant | 5.75 | 27.1 ± 0.860 |
| Ant-375 | 5.37 | 28.6 ± 0.748* |
*P < 0.05; (t(10) = 1.606, P = 0.1393)
Fig. 7miR-375 inhibition effects on egg development in Ant-375 compared to non-injected and Ms-Ant control