| Literature DB >> 30709020 |
Yu-Ning Peng1, Mei-Li Huang2, Chia-Hung Kao3,4,5.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to review published studies to obtain the best estimate of the risk of depression and anxiety among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.Entities:
Keywords: anxiety; colorectal cancer (CRC); depression
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30709020 PMCID: PMC6388369 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Article selection flow chart for the systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.
Characteristics of included studies for prevalence of depression.
| Included Studies | Participants |
| Female (%) | CRC Patients | Mean Age (Years) | Methods | Investigators | In/Out Patients | Prevalence of Depression (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fras et al., 1967, USA [ | Gastrointestinal cancer | 110 | Not cited | 64 | N/A | MMPI | Research assistants | Inpatients | 13 |
| Tsunoda et al., 2005, Japan [ | Colorectal cancer | 128 | 42.0 | 128 | 69 ± 10.5 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 36.7 |
| Matsushita et al., 2005, Japan [ | Digestive cancer | 85 | 37.6 | 38 | 68.0 ± 10.3 | HADS | Research assistants | Inpatients | 28 |
| Lynch et al., 2008, Australia [ | Colorectal cancer | 1822 | 40.0 | 1822 | Only age stratification | BSI-18 | Research assistants | Outpatients | 7.5 (6 months) |
| Tavoli et al., 2007, Iran [ | Gastrointestinal cancer | 142 | 44.4 | 54 | 54.1 ± 14.8 | HADS | Psychologist | Inpatients | 57 |
| Zhang et al., 2010, USA [ | Colorectal cancer | 56,182 | 53.4 | 56,182 | Only age stratification | ICD-9 | Psychiatrist | Outpatients | 1.6 |
| Medeiros et al., 2010, Brazil [ | Colorectal cancer | 37 | 56.8 | 37 | 59 ± 11.5 (chemotherapy group) | BDI | Research assistants | Inpatients | 19.4 |
| Hong et al., 2014, China [ | Mixed | 1217 | 40.3 | 103 | 51.2 ± 13.1 | HADS | Research assistants | Inpatients | 54.4 |
| Abu-Helalah et al., 2014, Jordan [ | Colorectal cancer | 241 | 47.7 | 241 | 56.7 ± 13.6 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 18 |
| Walker et al., 2014, UK [ | Mixed | 21,151 | 71.0 | 3355 | 64.4 ± 11.9 | HADS/SCID-I | Psychiatrist | Inpatients/Outpatients | 7 |
| Nikbakhsh et al., 2014, Iran [ | Mixed | 150 | 52.0 | 24 | 59.0 ± 14.3 | HADS | Research assistants | Inpatients/Outpatients | 16.9 |
| Akyol et al., 2015, Turkey [ | Colorectal cancer | 105 | 31.0 | 105 | 52.9 ± 9.0 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 44 |
| Clark et al., 2016, USA [ | Resected colorectal cancer | 1785 | 50.8 | 1785 | 78.0 ± 7.0 | VR-12 | Research assistants | Inpatients/Outpatients | 15.6 |
| Sun et al., 2017, Taiwan [ | Colorectal cancer | 135,288 | 39.0 | 27,242 | 64.2 ± 13.5 | ICD-9 | Psychiatrist | Inpatients/Outpatients | 6.6 |
| Mols et al., 2018, UK [ | Colorectal cancer | 2625 | 44.9 | 2625 | 69.4 ± 9.5 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 19 |
MMPI = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; BSI-18 = Brief Symptom Inventory-18; ICD-9 = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th Revision; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; SCID-I = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders; VR-12 = Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey.
Characteristics and analyses of included studies for prevalence of anxiety.
| Included Studies | Participants |
| Female (%) | CRC Patients | Mean Age | Methods | Investigators | In/Out-Patients | Prevalence of Anxiety (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fras et al., 1967, USA [ | Gastrointestinal cancer | 110 | Not cited | 64 | N/A | MMPI | Research assistants | Inpatients | 13 |
| Tsunoda et al., 2005, Japan [ | Colorectal cancer | 128 | 42.0 | 128 | 69 ± 10.5 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 7.8 |
| Lynch et al., 2008, Australia [ | Colorectal cancer | 1822 | 40.0 | 1822 | Only age stratification | BSI-18 | Research assistants | Outpatients | 7.4 (6 months) |
| Tavoli et al., 2007, Iran [ | Gastrointestinal cancer | 142 | 44.4 | 54 | 54.1 ± 14.8 | HADS | Psychologist | Inpatients | 47.2 |
| Zhang et al., 2010, USA [ | Colorectal cancer | 56,182 | 53.4 | 56,182 | Only age stratification | ICD-9 | Psychiatrist | Outpatients | 1.0 |
| Hong et al., 2014, China [ | Mixed | 1217 | 40.26 | 103 | 51.2 ± 13.1 | HADS | Research assistants | Inpatients | 2.9 |
| Abu-Helalah et al., 2014, Jordan [ | Colorectal cancer | 241 | 47.7 | 241 | 56.7 ± 13.6 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 23 |
| Nikbakhsh et al., 2014, Iran [ | Mixed | 150 | 52.0 | 24 | 59.0 ± 14.3 | HADS | Research assistants | Inpatients/Outpatients | 15.4 |
| Akyol et al., 2015, Turkey [ | Colorectal cancer | 105 | 31.0 | 105 | 52.9 ± 9.0 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 29 |
| Sun et al., 2017, Taiwan [ | Colorectal cancer | 135,288 | 39.0 | 27,242 | 64.2 ± 13.5 | ICD-9 | Psychiatrist | Inpatients/Outpatients | 32.5 |
| Mols et al., 2018, UK [ | Colorectal cancer | 2625 | 44.9 | 2625 | 69.4 ± 9.5 | HADS | Research assistants | Outpatients | 20.9 |
MMPI = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; BSI-18 = Brief Symptom Inventory-18; ICD-9 = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th Revision.
Quality assessment of the included trials following the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Appraisal Tool.
| Included Studies | Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 | Item 4 | Item 5 | Item 6 | Item 7 | Item 8 | Item 9 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fras et al., (1967) [ | Unclear | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | 5/9 |
| Tsunoda et al., (2005) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Matsushita et al., (2005) [ | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8/9 |
| Lynch et al., (Australia) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8/9 |
| Tavoli et al., (2007) [ | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7/9 |
| Zhang et al., (2010) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8/9 |
| Medeiros et al., (2010) [ | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8/9 |
| Hong et al., (2014) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Abu-Helalah et al., (2014) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Walker et al., (2014) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Nikbakhsh et al., (2014) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Akyol et al., (2015) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Clark et al., (2016) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Sun et al., (2017) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
| Mols et al., (2018) [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9/9 |
Item 1 = appropriate sample frame to address the target population; Item 2 = appropriate way to sample study participants; Item 3 = adequate sample size; Item 4 = study subjects and the setting described in detail; Item 5 = data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample; Item 7 = valid methods used for the identification of the condition; Item 7 = measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants; Item 8 = appropriate statistical analysis; Item 9 = appropriate response rate.