| Literature DB >> 30709002 |
Dong-Kyun Kim1, Hyunbin Jo2, Inwoo Han3, Ihn-Sil Kwak4,5.
Abstract
Our study aims to identify the spatial characteristics of water quality and sediment conditions in relation to fisheries resources, since the productivity of fisheries resources is closely related to the ambient conditions of the resource areas. We collected water quality samples and sediment contaminants from twenty-one sites at Gwangyang Bay, Korea, in the summer of 2018. Our study sites covered the area from the Seomjin River estuary to the inner and outer bays. To spatially characterize physicochemical features of Gwangyang Bay, we used Self-Organizing Map (SOM), which is known as a robust and powerful tool of unsupervised neural networks for pattern recognition. The present environmental conditions of Gwangyang Bay were spatially characterized according to four different attributes of water quality and sediment contamination. From the results, we put emphasis on several interesting points: (i) the SOM manifests the dominant physicochemical attributes of each geographical zone associated with the patterns of water quality and sediment contamination; (ii) fish populations appear to be closely associated with their food sources (e.g., shrimps and crabs) as well as the ambient physicochemical conditions; and (iii) in the context of public health and ecosystem services, the SOM result can potentially offer guidance for fish consumption associated with sediment heavy metal contamination. The present study may have limitations in representing general features of Gwangyang Bay, given the inability of snapshot data to characterize a complex ecosystem. In this regard, consistent sampling and investigation are needed to capture spatial variation and to delineate the temporal dynamics of water quality, sediment contamination, and fish populations. However, the SOM application is helpful and useful as a first approximation of an environmental assessment for the effective management of fisheries resources.Entities:
Keywords: Self-Organizing Map; coastal bay; environmental assessment; sediment contaminant; water quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30709002 PMCID: PMC6388285 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Map of the study sites (N = 21) at Gwangyang Bay in Korea.
Figure 2Conceptual structure of pattern recognition using Self-Organizing Map.
Figure 3Water quality observation at Gwangyang Bay. The numbers on the x axis indicate the study sites.
Figure 4Sediment contaminant observation at Gwangyang Bay. The numbers on the x axis indicate the study sites.
Figure 5Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) of water quality and sediment contaminants. The bars indicate the range of values (refer to Table 1 for the units). The right-bottom map presents four SOM clusters/groups.
Characterization of water quality and sediment contaminants using SOM.
| Variable | Unit | Mean | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | °C | 24.3 | 25.3 | 23.3 | 25.1 | |
| Salinity | psu | 28.6 | 29.1 | 21.4 | 28.0 | |
| TP | mg L−1 | 0.075 | 0.074 | 0.063 | 0.087 | |
| TN | mg L−1 | 0.365 | 0.377 | 0.262 | 0.414 | |
| TOC | mg L−1 | 1.96 | 1.78 | 2.10 | 1.73 | |
| TIC | mg L−1 | 22.0 | 21.6 | 18.3 | 22.4 | |
| Chl- | μg L−1 | 4.70 | 4.28 | 4.09 | 3.35 | |
| Ni | ppm | 28.7 | 22.4 | 24.1 | 30.2 | |
| Zn | ppm | 75.3 | 63.4 | 66.6 | 82.1 | |
| Co | ppm | 18.8 | 15.3 | 19.7 | 16.6 | |
| Se | ppm | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.9 | |
| Fe | % | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 | |
| Al | % | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 3.0 | |
| As | ppm | 5.6 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 6.5 | |
| Cd | ppm | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.10 | |
| Pb | ppm | 21.4 | 18.2 | 21.0 | 19.5 | |
| Cr | ppm | 47.7 | 40.5 | 49.1 | 43.6 | |
| Cu | ppm | 18.8 | 14.6 | 17.1 | 19.9 | |
| Mn | ppm | 691.3 | 538.5 | 643.6 | 431.9 |
* Bold numbers indicate the highest mean value among all groups for each variable.
Figure 6Comparison of water quality (left) and sediment contaminants (right) based on the SOM clusters. The values between 0 and 1 are normalized.
Observed fish populations at Gwangyang Bay in July 2018.
| Common Name | Scientific Name | Site 8 (%) | Site 11 (%) | Site 12 (%) | Site 13 (%) | Sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackhead seabream |
| 1 (0.2) | 1 | |||
| Cardinalfish |
| 13 (2.3) | 23 (10.4) | 36 | ||
| Common skate |
| 14 (2.5) | 6 (1.6) | 2 (1.0) | 22 | |
| Conger eel |
| 1 (0.3) | 1 | |||
| Daggertooth pike conger |
| 3 (0.5) | 4 (1.1) | 2 (1.0) | 9 | |
| Dorsal soft ray |
| 27 (4.9) | 3 (0.8) | 4 (2.0) | 8 (3.6) | 42 |
| Dotted gizzard shad |
| 1 (0.2) | 1 | |||
| False kelpfish |
| 15 (4.1) | 1 (0.5) | 16 | ||
| Filamentous shrimpgoby |
| 1 (0.5) | 1 | |||
| Fingerling rockfish |
| 1 (0.3) | 1 | |||
| Goblinfish |
| 7 (1.3) | 2 (0.5) | 9 | ||
| Grey stingfish |
| 1 (0.2) | 1 | |||
| Largehead hairtail |
| 4 (0.7) | 5 (1.4) | 4 (2.0) | 1 (0.5) | 14 |
| Pinkgray goby |
| 12 (3.3) | 12 | |||
| Red barracuda | 2 (0.9) | 2 | ||||
| Red eel goby |
| 5 (1.4) | 1 (0.5) | 6 | ||
| Red tongue sole |
| 12 (2.2) | 13 (3.5) | 3 (1.5) | 1 (0.5) | 29 |
| Sand smelt |
| 17 (3.1) | 17 | |||
| Scad |
| 2 (0.5) | 2 | |||
| Spiny red gurnard |
| 9 (1.6) | 6 (1.6) | 19 (9.3) | 2 (0.9) | 36 |
| Spotnape ponyfish |
| 263 (47.3) | 166 (45.0) | 22 (10.8) | 94 (42.3) | 545 |
| Tidepool gunnel |
| 2 (1.0) | 2 | |||
| White croaker |
| 142 (25.5) | 97 (26.3) | 109 (53.4) | 58 (26.1) | 406 |
| Wild marbled sole |
| 1 (0.2) | 1 | |||
| Yellow croaker |
| 41 (7.4) | 31 (8.4) | 33 (16.2) | 32 (14.4) | 137 |
| No. of species | 16 | 16 | 14 | 10 | ||
| Shannon diversity ( | 2.35 | 1.97 | 1.94 | 1.44 |
Spatial comparison in the biomass of fish, shrimps, and crabs at Gwangyang Bay in July 2018. Bold numbers indicate the highest value among the four sites.
| Fauna Type | Biomass | Site 8 | Site 11 | Site 12 | Site 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish | Individual biomass (g) | 28.9 | 33.6 | 25.6 | |
| Total biomass (kg) | 12.4 | 10.0 | 5.7 | ||
| Shrimps | Individual biomass (g) | 8.40 | 7.50 | 9.63 | |
| Total biomass (kg) | 0.42 | 0.83 | 0.09 | ||
| Crabs | Individual biomass (g) | 4.39 | 4.52 | 4.32 | |
| Total biomass (kg) | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
* Bold numbers indicate the highest mean value among all groups for each variable.