Literature DB >> 30708059

A review of boundary conditions and variables involved in the prevention of return of fear after post-retrieval extinction.

Pedro Fonseca Zuccolo1, Maria Helena Leite Hunziker2.   

Abstract

Experimental evidence suggests that the return of fear may be prevented by post-retrieval extinction (PRE), a procedure consisting of extinction training after the presentation of a retrieval cue. However, attempts to replicate these findings have yielded mixed results, with some studies showing diminished fear responses after PRE, whereas others show no effect on the return of fear following this procedure. The discrepancies across studies have been interpreted as evidence that there might be conditions under which PRE is not effective (boundary conditions), but these variables have yet to be fully described. We aimed to provide an overview of PRE in humans. We briefly present the theory and research that originated post-retrieval procedures with a focus on the experimental setup used in human studies. We continue with a compilation of possible experimental boundary conditions along with some questions for future research.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classical conditioning; Extinction; Fear; Reconsolidation; Retrieval cues

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30708059     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

1.  Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms: A verification report of Schiller et al. (2010).

Authors:  Anastasia Chalkia; Lukas Van Oudenhove; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  No persistent attenuation of fear memories in humans: A registered replication of the reactivation-extinction effect.

Authors:  Anastasia Chalkia; Natalie Schroyens; Lu Leng; Niels Vanhasbroeck; Ann-Kathrin Zenses; Lukas Van Oudenhove; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Testing the memory reconsolidation hypothesis in a fear extinction paradigm: The effects of ecological and arbitrary stimuli.

Authors:  Seda Dural; Ezgi Gür; Hakan Çetinkaya
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 1.926

4.  Neural substrates of propranolol-induced impairments in the reconsolidation of nicotine-associated memories in smokers.

Authors:  Xiao Lin; Jiahui Deng; Kai Yuan; Qiandong Wang; Lin Liu; Yanping Bao; Yanxue Xue; Peng Li; Jianyu Que; Jiajia Liu; Wei Yan; Hongqiang Sun; Ping Wu; Jie Shi; Le Shi; Lin Lu
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  No evidence for disruption of reconsolidation of conditioned threat memories with a cognitively demanding intervention.

Authors:  Lars Jaswetz; Lycia D de Voogd; Eni S Becker; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Destabilizing Different Strengths of Fear Memories Requires Different Degrees of Prediction Error During Retrieval.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Junjiao Li; Liang Xu; Shaochen Zhao; Min Fan; Xifu Zheng
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Evaluation of an angiotensin Type 1 receptor blocker on the reconsolidation of fear memory.

Authors:  Adam P Swiercz; Laxmi Iyer; Zhe Yu; Allison Edwards; N M Prashant; Bryan N Nguyen; Anelia Horvath; Paul J Marvar
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Investigating the efficacy of the reminder-extinction procedure to disrupt contextual threat memories in humans using immersive Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Maxime C Houtekamer; Marloes J A G Henckens; Wayne E Mackey; Joseph E Dunsmoor; Judith R Homberg; Marijn C W Kroes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.