OBJECTIVES: To evaluate thermal images (TIs) by using an algorithm for optimized region of interest (ROI) and image segmentation, in order to find zones of the facial skin surface with asymmetrical temperature, and to test consistency with CT findings, to detect maxillofacial pathologies (i.e. tumours). METHODS: The following steps for the TI evaluation were applied: data acquisition/pre-processing of frontal face and mouth projection, detection of face and mouth external contour, finding face and mouth symmetry axis, calculation of differences in average and maximal temperatures between left and right face and mouth sides, image segmentation of the selected ROI, and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy by comparing the TI results with CT findings. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, the average temperature difference between left/right sides of facial and mouth ROI was negligible (0.02 ± 0.21 °C and 0.05 ± 0.19 °C, respectively; n = 23). In the presence of tumour, the average temperature difference was higher in corresponding TIs (0.47 ± 0.1 °C and 0.66 ± 0.1 °C, for facial and mouth ROI, respectively; n = 19, p < 0.05). For large tumours, thermal asymmetry in the corresponding TI is easily detected, and image segmentation is optional for finding the affected zone. For small or deeply localized tumours, segmentation of the mouth cavity of the ROI was required for the detection of hot and cold spots. CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetrical temperature zones and their location as detected from thermal images coincide well with the presence and localization of maxillofacial pathologies (i.e. tumours) established by CT. However, accurate information could often be obtained only after application of image segmentation algorithm to the selected ROI.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate thermal images (TIs) by using an algorithm for optimized region of interest (ROI) and image segmentation, in order to find zones of the facial skin surface with asymmetrical temperature, and to test consistency with CT findings, to detect maxillofacial pathologies (i.e. tumours). METHODS: The following steps for the TI evaluation were applied: data acquisition/pre-processing of frontal face and mouth projection, detection of face and mouth external contour, finding face and mouth symmetry axis, calculation of differences in average and maximal temperatures between left and right face and mouth sides, image segmentation of the selected ROI, and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy by comparing the TI results with CT findings. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, the average temperature difference between left/right sides of facial and mouth ROI was negligible (0.02 ± 0.21 °C and 0.05 ± 0.19 °C, respectively; n = 23). In the presence of tumour, the average temperature difference was higher in corresponding TIs (0.47 ± 0.1 °C and 0.66 ± 0.1 °C, for facial and mouth ROI, respectively; n = 19, p < 0.05). For large tumours, thermal asymmetry in the corresponding TI is easily detected, and image segmentation is optional for finding the affected zone. For small or deeply localized tumours, segmentation of the mouth cavity of the ROI was required for the detection of hot and cold spots. CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetrical temperature zones and their location as detected from thermal images coincide well with the presence and localization of maxillofacial pathologies (i.e. tumours) established by CT. However, accurate information could often be obtained only after application of image segmentation algorithm to the selected ROI.
Authors: David I Conway; Mark Petticrew; Helen Marlborough; Julien Berthiller; Mia Hashibe; Lorna M D Macpherson Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 7.396