Grant Steele1, Tom Arneson2, Dylan Zylla3,4. 1. Park Nicollet Oncology Research, HealthPartners Institute, Frauenshuh Cancer Center, 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA. 2. Minnesota Department of Health, Office of Medical Cannabis, St. Paul, MN, USA. 3. Park Nicollet Oncology Research, HealthPartners Institute, Frauenshuh Cancer Center, 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA. dylan.zylla@parknicollet.com. 4. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. dylan.zylla@parknicollet.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the legalization of medical cannabis continues across the USA, oncology care providers will be increasingly asked to provide recommendations regarding its use in the cancer setting. In this article, we review recent literature that analyzes cannabis use specifically in patients with cancer and provide an accessible guide for clinicians, researchers, and patients. RECENT FINDINGS: We aimed to answer questions about the availability of cannabis in the USA, the trials supporting its use in the cancer setting, and the important factors to consider related to safety. Thirty states plus the District of Columbia have established comprehensive medical cannabis programs, each with different regulations and products available. In June 2018, Epidiolex, a cannabis extraction product containing 99% CBD, was approved to treat refractory seizures; however, whole-plant products and non-prescription extraction products dominate the market. Recent randomized, placebo-controlled studies of nabiximols (Sativex) in patients with refractory cancer-pain have largely shown no significant benefits. Conversely, large observational studies suggest patients with cancer using cannabis report significant improvement of many common symptoms. Cannabis use appears well tolerated, with few serious adverse effects reported. Though prospective clinical trials are needed to provide the robust data required to establish the proper role of cannabinoid and cannabis-based therapy in cancer patients, physicians can draw upon the knowledge currently available to have informed discussions with their patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the legalization of medical cannabis continues across the USA, oncology care providers will be increasingly asked to provide recommendations regarding its use in the cancer setting. In this article, we review recent literature that analyzes cannabis use specifically in patients with cancer and provide an accessible guide for clinicians, researchers, and patients. RECENT FINDINGS: We aimed to answer questions about the availability of cannabis in the USA, the trials supporting its use in the cancer setting, and the important factors to consider related to safety. Thirty states plus the District of Columbia have established comprehensive medical cannabis programs, each with different regulations and products available. In June 2018, Epidiolex, a cannabis extraction product containing 99% CBD, was approved to treat refractory seizures; however, whole-plant products and non-prescription extraction products dominate the market. Recent randomized, placebo-controlled studies of nabiximols (Sativex) in patients with refractory cancer-pain have largely shown no significant benefits. Conversely, large observational studies suggest patients with cancer using cannabis report significant improvement of many common symptoms. Cannabis use appears well tolerated, with few serious adverse effects reported. Though prospective clinical trials are needed to provide the robust data required to establish the proper role of cannabinoid and cannabis-based therapy in cancerpatients, physicians can draw upon the knowledge currently available to have informed discussions with their patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Cannabis; Marijuana; Palliative care
Authors: Jeremy R Johnson; Dominique Lossignol; Mary Burnell-Nugent; Marie T Fallon Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Aron H Lichtman; Eberhard Albert Lux; Robert McQuade; Sandro Rossetti; Raymond Sanchez; Wei Sun; Stephen Wright; Elena Kornyeyeva; Marie T Fallon Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Brian J Piper; Monica L Beals; Alexander T Abess; Stephanie D Nichols; Maurice W Martin; Catherine M Cobb; Rebecca M DeKeuster Journal: Pain Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Eyal Meiri; Haresh Jhangiani; James J Vredenburgh; Luigi M Barbato; Frederick J Carter; Hwa-Ming Yang; Vickie Baranowski Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Simona Pisanti; Anna Maria Malfitano; Elena Ciaglia; Anna Lamberti; Roberta Ranieri; Gaia Cuomo; Mario Abate; Giorgio Faggiana; Maria Chiara Proto; Donatella Fiore; Chiara Laezza; Maurizio Bifulco Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Alexia Blake; Bo Angela Wan; Leila Malek; Carlo DeAngelis; Patrick Diaz; Nicholas Lao; Edward Chow; Shannon O'Hearn Journal: Ann Palliat Med Date: 2017-08-23
Authors: Ilana M Braun; Alexi Wright; John Peteet; Fremonta L Meyer; David P Yuppa; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Jessica LeBlanc; Yuchiao Chang; Liyang Yu; Manan M Nayak; James A Tulsky; Joji Suzuki; Lida Nabati; Eric G Campbell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gil Bar-Sela; Marina Vorobeichik; Saher Drawsheh; Anat Omer; Victoria Goldberg; Ella Muller Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Andrea Tomko; Lauren O'Leary; Hilary Trask; John C Achenbach; Steven R Hall; Kerry B Goralski; Lee D Ellis; Denis J Dupré Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Helen McTaggart-Cowan; Colene Bentley; Adam Raymakers; Rebecca Metcalfe; Philippa Hawley; Stuart Peacock Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Vishal Narwani; Alexandra Bourdillon; Keerthana Nalamada; R Peter Manes; Douglas M Hildrew Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2020-10-30
Authors: Billy Vinette; José Côté; Ali El-Akhras; Hazar Mrad; Gabrielle Chicoine; Karine Bilodeau Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 4.430