Literature DB >> 30707248

[High donor age for liver transplantation : Tackling organ scarcity in Germany].

S Moosburner1, P V Ritschl1,2, L Wiering1, J M G V Gassner1, R Öllinger1, J Pratschke1, I M Sauer1, N Raschzok3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is the only curative treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease; however, the 40% decline of available organ donors in recent years in Germany necessitates the optimization of available resources and possibly extending the criteria to older donors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 2652 livers made available to the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin from 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed and the clinical outcome of 526 liver transplantations during this time frame were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median age of donors of transplanted organs increased from 49.3 years in 2010 to 57.3 years in 2016 (p = 0.02). Organs from donors ≥65 years were more frequently discarded than organs from younger donors (n = 344, 18.4% vs. n = 220, 28.1%; p = 0.005). Moreover, the older donors had higher rates of diabetes mellitus and hepatic steatosis. Organs from older donors had a higher donor risk index (2.8 vs. 2.2; p < 0.001) and were transplanted more often in patients with preserved liver function and hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis (n = 121, 74.7% of indications). The 3‑year survival after liver transplantation from donors ≥65 and ≥80 years old was not significantly reduced in comparison to younger donors; however, there was an increased retransplantation rate (28.6%; p = 0.005) after transplantation of organs from donors ≥80 years old.
CONCLUSION: Despite conservative organ acceptance there were higher rates of retransplantation after transplantation from very old donors. In the light of an increasing scarcity of suitable organs this mandates caution and highlights the need for adequate assessment instruments for marginal donor organs before transplantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged, 80 and over; Donor selection; Liver transplantation; Population dynamics; Resource allocation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30707248     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-019-0801-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  27 in total

Review 1.  Using old liver grafts for liver transplantation: where are the limits?

Authors:  Carlos Jiménez-Romero; Oscar Caso Maestro; Félix Cambra Molero; Iago Justo Alonso; Cristina Alegre Torrado; Alejandro Manrique Municio; Jorge Calvo Pulido; Carmelo Loinaz Segurola; Enrique Moreno González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The biopsied donor liver: incorporating macrosteatosis into high-risk donor assessment.

Authors:  Austin L Spitzer; Oliver B Lao; André A S Dick; Ramasamy Bakthavatsalam; Jeffrey B Halldorson; Matthew M Yeh; Melissa P Upton; Jorge D Reyes; James D Perkins
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Grade of deceased donor liver macrovesicular steatosis impacts graft and recipient outcomes more than the Donor Risk Index.

Authors:  Esther L de Graaf; James Kench; Pamela Dilworth; Nicholas A Shackel; Simone I Strasser; David Joseph; Henry Pleass; Michael Crawford; Geoff W McCaughan; Deborah J Verran
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 4.  Liver transplantation in the 21st century: expanding the donor options.

Authors:  David A Sass; David J Reich
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  The use of fatty liver grafts in modern allocation systems: risk assessment by the balance of risk (BAR) score.

Authors:  Philipp Dutkowski; Andrea Schlegel; Ksenija Slankamenac; Christian E Oberkofler; Rene Adam; Andrew K Burroughs; Eric Schadde; Beat Müllhaupt; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Effect of graft steatosis on liver function and organ survival after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Martin K Angele; Markus Rentsch; Wolfgang H Hartl; Benedikt Wittmann; Christian Graeb; Karl Walter Jauch; Florian Loehe
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 8.  The burden of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: morbidity, mortality, and costs.

Authors:  Ali Yazdanyar; Anne B Newman
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.076

9.  D-MELD, a simple predictor of post liver transplant mortality for optimization of donor/recipient matching.

Authors:  J B Halldorson; R Bakthavatsalam; O Fix; J D Reyes; J D Perkins
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  The difficulty in defining extended donor criteria for liver grafts: the Eurotransplant experience.

Authors:  Gerd R Silberhumer; Axel Rahmel; Vincent Karam; Mithat Gonen; Georg Gyoeri; Barbara Kern; Rene Adam; Ferdinand Muehlbacher; Xavier Rogiers; Andrew K Burroughs; Gabriela A Berlakovich
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 3.782

View more
  4 in total

1.  How Old Is Old? An Age-Stratified Analysis of Elderly Liver Donors above 65.

Authors:  Philipp Houben; Eike Bormann; Felicia Kneifel; Shadi Katou; Mehmet Haluk Morgül; Thomas Vogel; Ralf Bahde; Sonia Radünz; Andreas Pascher; Hartmut Schmidt; Jens Gunther Brockmann; Felix Becker
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Liver Grafts with Major Extended Donor Criteria May Expand the Organ Pool for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Vladimir J Lozanovski; Larissa T B Kerr; Elias Khajeh; Omid Ghamarnejad; Jan Pfeiffenberger; Katrin Hoffmann; De-Hua Chang; Markus Mieth; Thomas Longerich; Oliver Strobel; Karl Heinz Weiss; Markus W Büchler; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Over 30 Years of Pediatric Liver Transplantation at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Authors:  Simon Moosburner; Leke Wiering; Safak Gül-Klein; Paul Ritschl; Tomasz Dziodzio; Nathanael Raschzok; Christian Witzel; Alexander Gratopp; Stephan Henning; Philip Bufler; Moritz Schmelzle; Georg Lurje; Wenzel Schöning; Johann Pratschke; Brigitta Globke; Robert Öllinger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Early Allograft Dysfunction Increases Hospital Associated Costs After Liver Transplantation-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Simon Moosburner; Igor M Sauer; Frank Förster; Thomas Winklmann; Joseph Maria George Vernon Gassner; Paul V Ritschl; Robert Öllinger; Johann Pratschke; Nathanael Raschzok
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2020-12-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.