Literature DB >> 30707130

Pre-Use Ureteroscope Contamination after High Level Disinfection: Reprocessing Effectiveness and the Relation with Cumulative Ureteroscope Use.

Jaap D Legemate1, Guido M Kamphuis1, Jan Erik Freund1, Joyce Baard1, Harry W Oussoren2, Ingrid J B Spijkerman2, Jean J M C H de la Rosette1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the frequency of preoperative and persistent microbial contamination of flexible ureteroscopes after reprocessing and the relation of contamination to cumulative ureteroscope use.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of high level disinfection with peracetic acid as well as data on ureteroscope use for 20 new flexible ureteroscopes from December 2015 to December 2017 at a single center. In the operating room pre-use and postuse microbial samples of the ureteroscope shaft and working channel were collected to evaluate microbial contamination after reprocessing. Positive cultures were defined as 30 cfu/ml or greater of skin flora, or 10 cfu/ml or greater of uropathogenic microorganisms. A generalized estimating equation model was used to analyze whether cumulative ureteroscope use was associated with positive pre-use cultures.
RESULTS: Microbial samples were collected during 389 procedures. Pre-use ureteroscope cultures were positive in 47 of 389 procedures (12.1%), of which uropathogens were found in 9 of 389 (2.3%) and skin flora in 38 of 389 (9.8%). Urinary tract infection symptoms did not develop in any of the patients who underwent surgery with a uropathogen contaminated ureteroscope. In 1 case the pre-use culture contained the same bacteria type as the prior postuse culture. Cumulative ureteroscope use was not associated with a higher probability of positive cultures.
CONCLUSIONS: Microbial contamination of reprocessed ureteroscopes was found in an eighth of all procedures. Notably uropathogenic microorganisms were discovered in a small proportion of all procedures. Persistent ureteroscope contamination with uropathogens was only rarely encountered. Cumulative ureteroscope use was not associated with a higher probability of microbial contamination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease transmission; disinfection; equipment contamination; infectious; ureter; ureteroscopes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30707130     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Hughes; Amelia Pietropaolo; Patrick Jones; Marco Oderda; Paolo Gontero; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Alvaro Jiménez Godínez; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-08-25

3.  Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Niamh Smyth; Steeve Doizi; Alvaro Jiménez Godínez; Yazeed Barghouthy; Mariela Alejandra Corrales Acosta; Hatem Kamkoum; Bhaskar Somani; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.

Authors:  Giovanni S Marchini; Fábio C Torricelli; Carlos A Batagello; Manoj Monga; Fábio C Vicentini; Alexandre Danilovic; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 5.  Duodenoscope-associated infection prevention: A call for evidence-based decision making.

Authors:  Cori L Ofstead; Brandy L Buro; Krystina M Hopkins; John E Eiland; Harry P Wetzler; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-11-17

6.  Single-Use vs. Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscope to Treat Upper Urinary Calculi: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Fang Huang; Xiaoqiong Zhang; Yu Cui; Zewu Zhu; Yongchao Li; Jinbo Chen; Feng Zeng; Yang Li; Zhiyong Chen; Hequn Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 7.  Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dinah K Rindorf; Thomas Tailly; Guido M Kamphuis; Sara Larsen; Bhaskar K Somani; Olivier Traxer; Kevin Koo
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

8.  Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the lateral decubitus position for upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Jinqing Zhang; Binbin Li; Gang Li; Zengshi Yang; Ning Ye; Yihao Liu; Hongbing Zhuo; Jingfan Hong
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review.

Authors:  Bogdan Geavlete; Cristian Mareș; Răzvan Mulțescu; Dragoș Georgescu; Petrișor Geavlete
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.