BACKGROUND: During permanent nonselective His bundle (ns-HB) pacing, it is crucial to confirm HB capture/exclude that only right ventricle (RV) myocardial septal pacing is present. Because the effective refractory period (ERP) of the working myocardium is different than the ERP of the HB, we hypothesized that it should be possible to differentiate ns-HB capture from RV myocardial capture using programmed extrastimulus technique. METHODS: In consecutive patients during HB pacemaker implantation, programmed HB pacing was delivered from the screwed-in HB pacing lead. Premature beats were introduced at 10-ms steps during intrinsic rhythm and also after a drive train of 600 ms. The longest coupling interval that resulted in an abrupt change of QRS morphology was considered equal to ERP of HB or RV myocardium. RESULTS: Programmed HB pacing was performed from 50 different sites in 32 patients. In 34 of 36 cases of ns-HB pacing, the RV myocardial ERP was shorter than HB ERP (271.8±38 versus 353.0±30 ms; P<0.0001). Programmed HB pacing using a drive train resulted in a typical abrupt change of paced QRS morphology: from ns-HB to RV myocardial QRS (34 of 36 cases) or to selective HB QRS (2 of 36 cases). Programmed HB pacing delivered during native conduction resulted in obtaining selective HB QRS in 20 of 34 and RV myocardial QRS in 14 of 34 of the ns-HB cases. In RV myocardial-only pacing cases (false ns-HB pacing, n=14), such responses were not observed-the QRS morphology remained stable. Therefore, the programmed HB pacing correctly diagnosed all ns-HB cases and all RV myocardial pacing cases. CONCLUSIONS: A novel maneuver for the diagnosis of HB capture, based on the differences in ERP between HB and myocardium, was formulated, assessed, and found as diagnostically valuable. This method is unique in enabling to visualize selective HB QRS in patients with otherwise obligatory ns-HB pacing (RV myocardial capture threshold <HB capture threshold).
BACKGROUND: During permanent nonselective His bundle (ns-HB) pacing, it is crucial to confirm HB capture/exclude that only right ventricle (RV) myocardial septal pacing is present. Because the effective refractory period (ERP) of the working myocardium is different than the ERP of the HB, we hypothesized that it should be possible to differentiate ns-HB capture from RV myocardial capture using programmed extrastimulus technique. METHODS: In consecutive patients during HB pacemaker implantation, programmed HB pacing was delivered from the screwed-in HB pacing lead. Premature beats were introduced at 10-ms steps during intrinsic rhythm and also after a drive train of 600 ms. The longest coupling interval that resulted in an abrupt change of QRS morphology was considered equal to ERP of HB or RV myocardium. RESULTS: Programmed HB pacing was performed from 50 different sites in 32 patients. In 34 of 36 cases of ns-HB pacing, the RV myocardial ERP was shorter than HB ERP (271.8±38 versus 353.0±30 ms; P<0.0001). Programmed HB pacing using a drive train resulted in a typical abrupt change of paced QRS morphology: from ns-HB to RV myocardial QRS (34 of 36 cases) or to selective HB QRS (2 of 36 cases). Programmed HB pacing delivered during native conduction resulted in obtaining selective HB QRS in 20 of 34 and RV myocardial QRS in 14 of 34 of the ns-HB cases. In RV myocardial-only pacing cases (false ns-HB pacing, n=14), such responses were not observed-the QRS morphology remained stable. Therefore, the programmed HB pacing correctly diagnosed all ns-HB cases and all RV myocardial pacing cases. CONCLUSIONS: A novel maneuver for the diagnosis of HB capture, based on the differences in ERP between HB and myocardium, was formulated, assessed, and found as diagnostically valuable. This method is unique in enabling to visualize selective HB QRS in patients with otherwise obligatory ns-HB pacing (RV myocardial capture threshold <HB capture threshold).
Entities:
Keywords:
His bundle; electrophysiology; heart; myocardium; pacing; refractoriness
Authors: Ahran D Arnold; James P Howard; Aiswarya A Gopi; Cheng Pou Chan; Nadine Ali; Daniel Keene; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Ian J Wright; Fu Siong Ng; Nick W F Linton; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Nicholas S Peters; Daniel Rueckert; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett Journal: Cardiovasc Digit Health J Date: 2020 Jul-Aug