Literature DB >> 30706853

Effectuation to Cognize malignancy risk and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in salivary gland using "Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology": A 2 years retrospective study in academic institution.

Veer Karuna1, Priya Gupta1, Monika Rathi1, Kriti Grover1, Jitendra Singh Nigam2, Nidhi Verma1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To accost things in a particular disciple, egress related to Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and to standardize reporting pattern, a framework "Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology" (MSRSGC) has been sponsored. AIM: Aim of this study was to evaluate the potency of salivary gland FNAC reported under Milan guidelines, to calculate malignancy risk, and to compare the preoperative cytological diagnoses with the postoperative histopathological diagnoses. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study over a period of 2 years (May 2016 to April 2018), which was classified according to Milan system and correlation with histopathology. Furthermore, the risk of malignancy was calculated for all the diagnostic categories.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: FNAC were analyzed on 105 patients with palpable salivary gland. Results were distributed into six categories. About 76 cases were surgically treated and resected tissues were submitted for histopathological examination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The various diagnostic values of the procedure were calculated using the standard formula.
RESULTS: We reviewed 105 salivary gland FNA samples and recorded interpretations according to the proposed standardized six categories. Among them, category IV (neoplastic) had more cases (57.14%). The rates of malignancy in histology were as follows: (1) nondiagnostic, 0.0%; (2) nonneoplastic, 0.0%; (3) atypia of undermined significance, 50.00%; (4a) benign, 02.44%; (4b) uncertain malignant potential, 33.33%; (5) suspicious for malignancy, 100%; and (6) malignancy, 93.33%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of Milan system came out to be 85.00%, 98.14%, 94.44%, 94.64%, and 94.59%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The six-tier diagnostic categories of the Milan system helps in triaging patients with salivary gland swelling and thus facilitate individualized management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytohistological correlation; Milan nomenclature; diagnostic accuracy; predictive value; rate of malignancy; salivary gland; sensitivity; specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706853     DOI: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_380_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol        ISSN: 0377-4929            Impact factor:   0.740


  5 in total

1.  Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology- An Experience from Western Indian Population.

Authors:  Vaishali P Gaikwad; Chanda Anupriya; Leena P Naik
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Salivary Gland FNA Diagnostics in a Real-Life Setting: One-Year-Experiences of the Implementation of the Milan System in a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Erkka Tommola; Satu Tommola; Sinikka Porre; Ivana Kholová
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Application of Milan system for reporting of salivary gland pathology and risk stratification: An institutional experience.

Authors:  Sneha Singh; Prem Singh; Ridhima Auplish; Shiv Pankaj Khanna; Karan Verma; Sukhpreet Kaur Aulakh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2020-09-09

4.  Risk stratification by application of Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: A tertiary care experience.

Authors:  Jyotsna Naresh Bharti; Poonam Elhence; Meenakshi Rao; Aasma Nalwa; Sudeep Khera
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: An outcome of retrospective application to three years' cytology data of a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Garima Singh; Aarzoo Jahan; Shakti Kumar Yadav; Ruchika Gupta; Namrata Sarin; Sompal Singh
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.091

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.