Literature DB >> 30706352

Adjustment of vascular 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose uptake values over time through a modeling approach.

Pavlos P Kafouris1,2, Iosif P Koutagiar3, Alexandros T Georgakopoulos2, Nikoletta K Pianou2, Marinos G Metaxas2, George M Spyrou4, Constantinos D Anagnostopoulos5.   

Abstract

To develop and test a model predicting 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) standardized uptake value (SUV) changes over time in the aorta and the superior vena cava (SVC). Maximum aortic SUV and mean SVC SUV were determined at two time points (T1 and T2) in the ascending (ASC), descending (DSC), abdominal (ABD) aorta, aortic arch (ARC) and SVC of patients who have undergone [18F]FDG PET/CT for clinical purposes. For SUV prediction at T2, linear and non-linear models of SUV difference for a given time change were developed in a derivation group. The results were tested in an independent validation group, whilst model reproducibility was tested in patients of the validation group who have undergone a second clinically indicated scan. Applying the linear model in the derivation group, there were no statistically significant differences in measurements obtained in the examined segments: mean differences ranged from 0 ± 0.10 in SVC to 0.01 ± 0.13 in ARC between measured and predicted SUV. In contrast, in the non-linear model, there were statistically significant differences in measurements, except in ARC, with mean differences ranging from 0.04 ± 0.14 in ARC to 0.28 ± 0.13 in ABD. In the validation group using the linear model, there were no statistically significant differences, with mean differences ranging from - 0.01 ± 0.08 in ASC to - 0.03 ± 0.11 in ABD. Regarding reproducibility, mean differences were no statistically significant, ranging from 0.004 ± 0.06 in ASC to - 0.02 ± 0.16 in ABD. We have developed a linear model allowing accurate and reproducible prediction of SUV changes over time in the aorta and SVC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular imaging; Circulation time; Delayed imaging; PET/CT; Standardized uptake value; [18F]FDG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706352     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-01514-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  23 in total

1.  Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; F E Harrell; G J Borsboom; M J Eijkemans; Y Vergouwe; J D Habbema
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences.

Authors:  Sylvain Beaulieu; Paul Kinahan; Jeffrey Tseng; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Pam Pham; Barbara Lewellen; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Optimizing imaging time for improved performance in oncology PET studies.

Authors:  Joseph A Thie; Karl F Hubner; Gary T Smith
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage.

Authors:  Joseph A Thie
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Time course of tumor SUV in 18F-FDG PET of breast cancer: presentation of a simple model using a single reference point for time corrections of tumor SUVs.

Authors:  Alexander R Stahl; Till A Heusner; Verena Hartung; James Nagarajah; Andreas Bockisch; Steffen Hahn; Gerald Antoch; Walter Jentzen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  What is the natural history of 18F-FDG uptake in arterial atheroma on PET/CT? Implications for imaging the vulnerable plaque.

Authors:  Leon J Menezes; Irfan Kayani; Simona Ben-Haim; Brian Hutton; Peter J Ell; Ashley M Groves
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 8.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; James W Fletcher
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues.

Authors:  Nancy Paquet; Adelin Albert; Jacqueline Foidart; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Time sensitivity: a parameter reflecting tumor metabolic kinetics by variable dual-time F-18 FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  Ching-yee Oliver Wong; Daniel Noujaim; Hungsen F Fu; Wen-sheng Huang; Cheng-yi S Cheng; Joseph Thie; Ishani Dalal; Chih-yung Chang; Conrad Nagle
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.