Firas J Al Badarin1,2, John A Spertus3,4, Timothy M Bateman3,4,5, Krishna K Patel3,4, Eric V Burgett3, Kevin F Kennedy3, Randall C Thompson3,4. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Research, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO, 64111, USA. falbadarin@yahoo.com. 2. School of Medicine, University of Missouri- Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA. falbadarin@yahoo.com. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Research, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO, 64111, USA. 4. School of Medicine, University of Missouri- Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA. 5. Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing emphasis on reducing radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), the use of radiation-sparing practices (RSP) at nuclear laboratories remains limited. Defining real-world impact of RSPs on effective radiation dose (E) can potentially further motivate their adoption. METHODS: MPI studies performed between 1/2010 and 12/2016 within a single health system were included. Mean E was compared between sites with 'basic' RSP (defined as elimination of thallium-based protocols and use of stress-only (SO) imaging on conventional single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) cameras) and those with 'advanced' capabilities (sites that additionally used solid-state detector (SSD) SPECT cameras, advanced post-processing software (APPS) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging), after matching patients by age, gender, and weight. Contributions of individual RSP to E reduction were determined using multiple linear regression after adjusting for factors affecting tracer dose. RESULTS: Among 55,930 MPI studies performed, the use of advanced RSP was associated with significantly lower mean E compared to basic RSP (7 ± 5.6 mSv and 16 ± 5.4 mSv, respectively; P < 0.001), with a greater likelihood of achieving E < 9 mSv (65.7% vs. 10.8%, respectively; OR 15.8 [95% CI 14 to 17.8]; P < 0.0001). Main driver of E reduction was SO-SSD SPECT (mean reduction = 11.5 mSv), followed by use of SO-SPECT + APPS (mean reduction = 10.1 mSv), ;ET (mean reduction = 9.7 mSv); and elimination of thallium protocols (mean reduction = 9.1 mSv); P < 0.0001 for all comparisons. CONCLUSION: In a natural experiment with implementation of radiation-saving practices at a large health system, stress-only protocols used in conjunction with modern SPECT technologies, the use of PET and elimination of thallium-based protocols were associated with greatest reductions in radiation dose. Availability of several approaches to dose reduction within a health system can facilitate achievement of targeted radiation benchmarks in a greater number of performed studies.
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing emphasis on reducing radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), the use of radiation-sparing practices (RSP) at nuclear laboratories remains limited. Defining real-world impact of RSPs on effective radiation dose (E) can potentially further motivate their adoption. METHODS: MPI studies performed between 1/2010 and 12/2016 within a single health system were included. Mean E was compared between sites with 'basic' RSP (defined as elimination of thallium-based protocols and use of stress-only (SO) imaging on conventional single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) cameras) and those with 'advanced' capabilities (sites that additionally used solid-state detector (SSD) SPECT cameras, advanced post-processing software (APPS) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging), after matching patients by age, gender, and weight. Contributions of individual RSP to E reduction were determined using multiple linear regression after adjusting for factors affecting tracer dose. RESULTS: Among 55,930 MPI studies performed, the use of advanced RSP was associated with significantly lower mean E compared to basic RSP (7 ± 5.6 mSv and 16 ± 5.4 mSv, respectively; P < 0.001), with a greater likelihood of achieving E < 9 mSv (65.7% vs. 10.8%, respectively; OR 15.8 [95% CI 14 to 17.8]; P < 0.0001). Main driver of E reduction was SO-SSD SPECT (mean reduction = 11.5 mSv), followed by use of SO-SPECT + APPS (mean reduction = 10.1 mSv), ;ET (mean reduction = 9.7 mSv); and elimination of thallium protocols (mean reduction = 9.1 mSv); P < 0.0001 for all comparisons. CONCLUSION: In a natural experiment with implementation of radiation-saving practices at a large health system, stress-only protocols used in conjunction with modern SPECT technologies, the use of PET and elimination of thallium-based protocols were associated with greatest reductions in radiation dose. Availability of several approaches to dose reduction within a health system can facilitate achievement of targeted radiation benchmarks in a greater number of performed studies.
Authors: Mathew Mercuri; Thomas N B Pascual; John J Mahmarian; Leslee J Shaw; Maurizio Dondi; Diana Paez; Andrew J Einstein Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Randall C Thompson; James H O'Keefe; A Iain McGhie; Kevin A Bybee; Elaine C Thompson; Timothy M Bateman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-07
Authors: James A Case; Robert A deKemp; Piotr J Slomka; Mark F Smith; Gary V Heller; Manuel D Cerqueira Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Andrew J Einstein; Daniel S Berman; James K Min; Robert C Hendel; Thomas C Gerber; J Jeffrey Carr; Manuel D Cerqueira; S James Cullom; Robert DeKemp; Neal W Dickert; Sharmila Dorbala; Reza Fazel; Ernest V Garcia; Raymond J Gibbons; Sandra S Halliburton; Jörg Hausleiter; Gary V Heller; Scott Jerome; John R Lesser; Gilbert L Raff; Peter Tilkemeier; Kim A Williams; Leslee J Shaw Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; Staci A Courter; Robert A Golub; James A Case; S James Cullom Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Andrew J Einstein; Thomas N B Pascual; Mathew Mercuri; Ganesan Karthikeyan; João V Vitola; John J Mahmarian; Nathan Better; Salah E Bouyoucef; Henry Hee-Seung Bom; Vikram Lele; V Peter C Magboo; Erick Alexánderson; Adel H Allam; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Albert Flotats; Scott Jerome; Philipp A Kaufmann; Osnat Luxenburg; Leslee J Shaw; S Richard Underwood; Madan M Rehani; Ravi Kashyap; Diana Paez; Maurizio Dondi Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Oliver Lindner; Thomas N B Pascual; Mathew Mercuri; Wanda Acampa; Wolfgang Burchert; Albert Flotats; Philipp A Kaufmann; Anastasia Kitsiou; Juhani Knuuti; S Richard Underwood; João V Vitola; John J Mahmarian; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nathan Better; Madan M Rehani; Ravi Kashyap; Maurizio Dondi; Diana Paez; Andrew J Einstein Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 9.236