Literature DB >> 3070606

Litigating a right to treatment: Woe is me.

S Rachlin1.   

Abstract

The right to treatment was first proposed by Birnbaum in 1960. While its constitutional basis may still be in doubt, it has found significant acceptance in state legislation and in lower court decisions. Defining, implementing, and quantifying this right remain elusive. For well over a decade, the case of Walter Woe has been litigated in the federal courts of New York. It represents a continuing effort to obtain a level of care for patients involuntarily hospitalized in the public sector equal to that provided for those admitted voluntarily to general and private hospitals. A precommitment right to refuse inadequate treatment is a novel extension of the right to treatment, with potentially significant implications, and is part of the continuing legal battle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3070606     DOI: 10.1007/bf01064242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  6 in total

1.  The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.

Authors:  Alan Meisel
Journal:  Law Contemp Probl       Date:  1982

2.  Changing a state mental health system through litigation: the Arizona experiment.

Authors:  J M Santiago; A Gittler; A Beigel; L Stein; P J Brown
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Resurrecting the right to treatment.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1987-07

4.  Patients' rights: the action moves to state courts.

Authors:  R D Miller; S Rachlin; P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1987-04

5.  The influence of law on deinstitutionalization.

Authors:  S Rachlin
Journal:  New Dir Ment Health Serv       Date:  1983-03

6.  With liberty and psychosis for all.

Authors:  S Rachlin
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  1974
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.