| Literature DB >> 30705980 |
Abstract
The aim of present article is to explore the novel aspects of activation energy in nonlinearly convective flow of Maxwell nanofluid driven by nonlinearly stretched inclined cylinder. Generalized forms of Fourier's and Fick's law are utilized through Cattaneo-Christov double diffusion scheme. Maxwell nanomaterial model is used to describe the significant slip mechanism namely known as Brownian and thermophoresis diffusions. Features of double stratification, non-uniform heat generation/absorption, binary chemical reaction and activation energy are considered for present flow problem. Modified Arrhenius formula for activation energy is implemented. The resulting nonlinear system is cracked for series solutions via homotopy technique. Effects of different flow parameters on temperature, nanoparticle volume concentration and velocity fields are examined through graphs and tables. Numerical computations are performed for local Nusselt and Sherwood numbers. Our analysis reveals that nanoparticle concentration is directly proportional to the chemical reaction with activation energy. Moreover stratification variables diminish the temperature and concentration. It is also noticed that higher estimation of Deborah number declines the velocity profile of Maxwell fluid. Numerical outcomes are compared with previous published results and found to be in good agreement for limiting cases of the evolving parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Applied mathematics; Computational mathematics; Mechanics
Year: 2019 PMID: 30705980 PMCID: PMC6348168 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Flow geometry.
Fig. 2and .
Numerical convergence of and when .
| Approximation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.38642 | 0.30745 | 0.58247 |
| 5 | 0.39123 | 0.32012 | 0.58479 |
| 11 | 0.39627 | 0.31426 | 0.58640 |
| 16 | 0.40878 | 0.32562 | 0.58718 |
| 20 | 0.41403 | 0.32766 | 0.58956 |
| 26 | 0.42891 | 0.33412 | 0.58956 |
| 30 | 0.42891 | 0.33694 | 0.58956 |
| 36 | 0.42891 | 0.33694 | 0.58956 |
| 42 | 0.42891 | 0.33694 | 0.58956 |
Numerical values of and when , .
| Pr | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.63743 | 0.58893 |
| 1.4 | 0.85856 | 0.75205 | |||||||
| 2.0 | 1.01772 | 1.00130 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.80632 | 0.05884 |
| 0.6 | 0.78427 | 0.87407 | |||||||
| 0.8 | 0.73593 | 0.98916 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.86094 | 0.93704 |
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.86094 | 0.93704 |
| 0.6 | 0.77561 | 0.49833 | |||||||
| 0.8 | 0.70283 | 0.12053 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.86719 | 0.87640 |
| 0.3 | 0.83011 | 0.82077 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.77059 | 0.76344 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.75056 | 1.27534 |
| 0.3 | 0.77575 | 1.34103 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.79540 | 0.84569 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.88566 | 0.86745 |
| 0.4 | 0.88539 | 0.87342 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.87520 | 0.89011 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.76876 | 0.85878 |
| 0.4 | 0.78456 | 0.87453 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.79348 | 0.88324 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.85432 | 0.95759 |
| 0.3 | 0.81672 | 0.98432 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.76043 | 1.21434 |
Comparative analysis of present results of via when = .
| Ref. | Ref. | Present (HAM) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.999978 | 0.999962 | 1.00001 |
| 0.3 | 1.101848 | 1.101850 | 1.10196 |
| 0.6 | 1.150160 | 1.150163 | 1.15019 |
| 0.8 | 1.196690 | 1.196692 | 1.19676 |
| 1.2 | 1.285253 | 1.285257 | 1.28538 |
| 1.6 | 1.368641 | 1.368641 | 1.36867 |
| 2.0 | 1.447616 | 1.447617 | 1.44783 |
Comparative analysis of present results of via when
| Ec | n | Ref. | Present (HAM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.595277 | 0.59538 |
| 1.5 | 0.574537 | 0.57457 | |
| 3.0 | 0.564472 | 0.56452 | |
| 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.556623 | 0.55671 |
| 1.5 | 0.530966 | 0.53085 | |
| 3.0 | 0.517977 | 0.51788 |
Fig. 4Response of .
Fig. 5Response of .
Fig. 6Response of .
Fig. 3Response of .
Fig. 7Response of with .
Fig. 8Response of with .
Fig. 9Response of .
Fig. 10Response of with .
Fig. 11Response of with .
Fig. 12Response of with .
Fig. 13Response of with .
Fig. 14Response of with .
Fig. 15Response of with .
Fig. 16Response of with .
Fig. 17Response of with .
Fig. 18Response of with .
Fig. 19Response of with .
Fig. 20Response of with .
Fig. 21Response of with .
Fig. 22Response of with .
Fig. 23Response of with .
Fig. 24Response of with .
Fig. 25Response of with .
Fig. 26Response of with .
Fig. 27Response of with .