BACKGROUND: Gestational weight gain (GWG) is a major risk factor of poor pregnancy outcomes. Obese pregnant women frequently report bias and discrimination when dealing with healthcare providers (HCPs). Effective communication of GWG recommendations may impact risks. Study objectives were to identify perceptions of HCPs in communicating GWG recommendations and to identify potential gaps/opportunities that could be addressed in the development of appropriate materials/programmes. METHODS: A survey tool was created using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to capture HCPs' attitudes, behaviours and intentions, using four-point Likert questions. Surveys were distributed to obstetricians/gynaecologists, family physicians, obstetric residents/ fellows, midwives, registered/public health nurses and registered dietitians. RESULTS: Results from 96 surveys show that HCPs agreed discussing GWG was important (100%), beneficial for patient-provider rapport (86%) and best practice (100%); however, most found it unpleasant (68%). Providers have confidence in their skills to provide nutrition advice (71%) and believe they have sufficient training (56%); yet, 31% acknowledged making derogatory comments and indicated that they could improve their communication of GWG (92%). CONCLUSIONS: HCPs believe they are providing GWG recommendations in an effective and empathetic manner. While an underlying current of bias/discrimination remains, there is recognition of the importance of more training and access to appropriate tools.
BACKGROUND: Gestational weight gain (GWG) is a major risk factor of poor pregnancy outcomes. Obese pregnant women frequently report bias and discrimination when dealing with healthcare providers (HCPs). Effective communication of GWG recommendations may impact risks. Study objectives were to identify perceptions of HCPs in communicating GWG recommendations and to identify potential gaps/opportunities that could be addressed in the development of appropriate materials/programmes. METHODS: A survey tool was created using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to capture HCPs' attitudes, behaviours and intentions, using four-point Likert questions. Surveys were distributed to obstetricians/gynaecologists, family physicians, obstetric residents/ fellows, midwives, registered/public health nurses and registered dietitians. RESULTS: Results from 96 surveys show that HCPs agreed discussing GWG was important (100%), beneficial for patient-provider rapport (86%) and best practice (100%); however, most found it unpleasant (68%). Providers have confidence in their skills to provide nutrition advice (71%) and believe they have sufficient training (56%); yet, 31% acknowledged making derogatory comments and indicated that they could improve their communication of GWG (92%). CONCLUSIONS: HCPs believe they are providing GWG recommendations in an effective and empathetic manner. While an underlying current of bias/discrimination remains, there is recognition of the importance of more training and access to appropriate tools.
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; Truls Ostbye; Kathryn I Pollak; Margaret Gradison; Lori A Bastian; Rebecca J Namenek Brouwer Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2007 Jul-Aug
Authors: Naomi E Stotland; Jennifer S Haas; Phyllis Brawarsky; Rebecca A Jackson; Elena Fuentes-Afflick; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Dorte M Jensen; Per Ovesen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Lars Mølsted-Pedersen; Bente Sørensen; Christina Vinter; Peter Damm Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Allison A Hedley; Cynthia L Ogden; Clifford L Johnson; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sharon J Herring; Emily Oken; Jess Haines; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Ken P Kleinman ScD; Matthew W Gillman Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Arthur T Kopylov; Anna L Kaysheva; Olga Papysheva; Iveta Gribova; Galina Kotaysch; Lubov Kharitonova; Tatiana Mayatskaya; Anna Krasheninnikova; Sergey G Morozov Journal: Cells Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Arthur T Kopylov; Olga Papysheva; Iveta Gribova; Galina Kotaysch; Lubov Kharitonova; Tatiana Mayatskaya; Ekaterina Sokerina; Anna L Kaysheva; Sergey G Morozov Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 4.379