BACKGROUND: Unstable ankle syndesmosis injuries are common, and the optimal surgical fixation is controversial. The two main options for stabilization of syndesmotic injuries are suture button fixation and screw fixation. Suture button fixation has a higher initial cost, but may have a lower hardware removal rate. The purpose of this study was to compare the costs of syndesmotic fixation. METHODS: A cost analysis was performed at a single university-affiliated hospital. Variables included the number of suture buttons, the number and type of syndesmosis screws used, and the frequency of hardware removal and operative time required for hardware removal. There were four clinical scenarios evaluated: (A) one suture button versus one cortical screw; (B) two suture buttons versus two cortical screws; (C) one suture button versus one locking screw; (D) two suture buttons versus two locking screws. Suture button removal rate was assumed to be 0% in the analysis. RESULTS: Cost equivalence was achieved at an 18 to 53% syndesmotic screw removal rate depending on the fixation construct used and the amount of time required for hardware removal. When the syndesmosis screws were removed 100% of the time, suture button fixation was more economical by $85,000-$194,656 per 100 ankles. When hardware was never removed, suture button fixation was more expensive by $169,844-$295,500 per 100 ankles. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the costs associated with syndesmosis fixation are more dependent on the rate of hardware removal than the type of hardware utilized. Routine removal of syndesmosis screws is clearly less economical than suture button fixation.
BACKGROUND: Unstable ankle syndesmosis injuries are common, and the optimal surgical fixation is controversial. The two main options for stabilization of syndesmotic injuries are suture button fixation and screw fixation. Suture button fixation has a higher initial cost, but may have a lower hardware removal rate. The purpose of this study was to compare the costs of syndesmotic fixation. METHODS: A cost analysis was performed at a single university-affiliated hospital. Variables included the number of suture buttons, the number and type of syndesmosis screws used, and the frequency of hardware removal and operative time required for hardware removal. There were four clinical scenarios evaluated: (A) one suture button versus one cortical screw; (B) two suture buttons versus two cortical screws; (C) one suture button versus one locking screw; (D) two suture buttons versus two locking screws. Suture button removal rate was assumed to be 0% in the analysis. RESULTS: Cost equivalence was achieved at an 18 to 53% syndesmotic screw removal rate depending on the fixation construct used and the amount of time required for hardware removal. When the syndesmosis screws were removed 100% of the time, suture button fixation was more economical by $85,000-$194,656 per 100 ankles. When hardware was never removed, suture button fixation was more expensive by $169,844-$295,500 per 100 ankles. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the costs associated with syndesmosis fixation are more dependent on the rate of hardware removal than the type of hardware utilized. Routine removal of syndesmosis screws is clearly less economical than suture button fixation.
Authors: Kenneth A Egol; Nirmal C Tejwani; Michael G Walsh; Edward L Capla; Kenneth J Koval Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kenneth A Egol; Brian Pahk; Michael Walsh; Nirmal C Tejwani; Roy I Davidovitch; Kenneth J Koval Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Jan Niklas Altmeppen; Christian Colcuc; Christian Balser; Yves Gramlich; Alexander Klug; Oliver Neun; Sebastian Manegold; Reinhard Hoffmann; Sebastian Fischer Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.964