| Literature DB >> 30705322 |
Smruti K Nair1, Sukanya Basu2, Ballari Sen1, Meng-Hsuan Lin1, Arati N Kumar1, Yuan Yuan1, Paul J Cullen2, Debanjan Sarkar3,4.
Abstract
Endothelial morphogenesis into capillary networks is dependent on the matrix morphology and mechanical properties. In current 3D gels, these two matrix features are interdependent and their distinct roles in endothelial orEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30705322 PMCID: PMC6355882 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37788-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Mechanomorphological features of gelatin based colloidal gel to study endothelial morphogenesis. Different mechanisms of electrostatic interaction mediated aggregation of positively charged colloidal particle form different microstructure, with electrolyte mediated dense and polyelectrolyte mediated ramified network. Variance of microstructural morphology and gel stiffness combined can regulate endothelial cell organization.
Figure 2Electrostatic interaction mediated aggregation of colloidal gelatin particles. (a) Microscopic images of colloidal gelatin A particles from scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence images showing submicron particles which are uniformly dispersed. Average size and surface charge (zeta potential) measured by dynamic light scattering. (b) Variation of zeta potential of colloidal gelatin A particles as a function of ionic strength (from HEPES buffer at pH 7) and pH (with 1 mM HEPES buffer). (c) Size and zeta potential of aggregates following addition of 4 M sodium chloride (N), 10% (w/v) Na-salt of polyacrylic acid (P), and 1:1 negatively charged gelatin B (AB) particles showing aggregation of particles due to electrostatic interactions. (d) Morphological character of clustered network of N-, P- and AB- from fluorescence images and their corresponding distance map from ImageJ and their size (from equivalent diameter) and shape (from circularity index) analysis showing characteristic difference in particle organization in N-, P- and AB- aggregate (**P ≤ 0.01, ANOVA).
Figure 3Aggregation mechanism and kinetics of colloidal gelatin particles. (a) Dispersibility factor ‘n’ of colloidal gelatin A particles and N-, P-, and AB- aggregates measured at 0.05 particle fraction, where decreased ‘n’ indicates aggregation (**P ≤ 0.01, ANOVA). (b) Variation of ‘n’ of colloidal gelatin A particles and N-, P-, and AB- aggregates with particle fraction shows difference in the dependence of particle fraction for aggregation (lines are estimate for guidance). (c) Kinetics of aggregation for N-, P-, and AB- aggregates (in comparison to non-aggregating colloidal gelatin A particles) measured at 0.05 particle fraction shows initial (shaded region) slow linear decrease followed by rapid decrease in optical density. Rapid decrease phase fitted with KWW function (see materials and methods) to extract the relaxation time constant for N-, P-, and AB- aggregates show highest relaxation time for P-aggregates (**P ≤ 0.01, ANOVA).
Figure 4Morphology of gelatin based colloidal gels. (a) Microstructured morphology of N-, P-and AB-gel from scanning electron microscopic images. Morphological features of the microstructure analyzed by measuring characteristic length, intersection density and void areas of the gels from these images using DiameterJ plugin in ImageJ (**P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05, ANOVA). (b) Confocal scanning fluorescent images and 3D interactive surface plot (color code indicates z-depth) of gels showing morphology and spatial distribution of voids in the gels. Lower panel images are enlarged version for better visualization.
Figure 5Mechanical characterizations of colloidal gel from rheology. (a) Strain amplitude sweep of N-, P-and AB-gel at different particle fractions measured at constant frequency. (b) Variation of elastic moduli (G′) and (c) tan(δ) of N-, P- and AB-gel with different particle fractions measured from linear viscoelastic region. (d) Viscosity and shear thinning behavior with respect to shear rate of N-, P- and AB-gel with different particle fractions.
Figure 6Time-dependent viscoelastic response from creep measurement. (a) Deformation of N-, P- and AB-gel with different particle fractions at constant stress of 2 Pa for 100 s. (b) Creep ringing phenomena from damped oscillation in strain observed at early creep time within 10 s of the gels.
Figure 7Endothelial morphogenesis in colloidal gel. Morphogenesis of endothelial cells in N-, P- and AB-gel (a) with 0.05 particle fraction, and (c) with 0.2 particle fraction, at 48 hrs from H&E stained images. Quantification of endothelial network structure from tube length and numbers junction per tube in N-, P- and AB-gel (b) with 0.05 particle fraction, and (d) with 0.2 particle fraction, at 48 hrs analyzed from H&E stained images after skeletonization of the images using ImageJ (**P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05, ANOVA).
Figure 8Cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions guide endothelial morphogenesis in colloidal gels. (a) Levels of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), phosphorylated FAK (p-FAK), and VE-cadherin in endothelial cells measured by immunoblot analysis. β-actin as loading control in N-, P- and AB-gel (a) with 0.05 particle fraction, and (c) with 0.2 particle fraction, at 48 hrs. Quantified level FAK, p-FAK and VE-cadherin normalized to β-actin shows differential level of markers in endothelial cells in N-, P- and AB-gel (b) with 0.05 particle fraction, and (d) with 0.2 particle fraction, at 48 hrs (**P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05, ANOVA). (e) Relative change of FAK, and VE-cadherin in endothelial cells in N-, P- and AB-gel with 0.2 particle fraction with respect to gels with 0.05 particle fraction. The corresponding full length blots are represented in Supplementary Fig. S8.