Literature DB >> 3070520

Acute and subacute effects of diazepam on human performance: comparison of plain tablet and controlled release capsule.

M Mattila1.   

Abstract

The psychomotor performance of 9 healthy volunteers was measured in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over manner after single doses (Day 1) and one-week maintenance (Day 8) with diazepam given in uncoated tablets (DZ) or in controlled-release capsule (DZ-CR). The performance was measured objectively (simulated driving, digit symbol substitution, Maddox wing, flicker fusion, tapping rate) and subjectively (visual analogue scales, questionnaires) at baseline and 1.5 and 3 hrs after the intake of DZ 15 mg, DZ-CR 20 mg, or placebo. The maintenance dose for diazepam was 10 mg daily. Subjective, but not objective, responses to placebo were evident on Day 1, but not on Day 8. As expected, DZ impaired most objective test performances on Day 1, the strongest effects seen at 1.5 hr. Subjectively it caused drowsiness and impaired performance. These effects were weaker but still significant on Day 8. DZ-CR produced less effects on both objective and subjective measurements on Day 1. It was about inert on Day 8, yet exophoria and subjective muzziness increased after the last dose; the subjects did not experience their performance as impaired. Measurements of plasma benzodiazepine concentrations confirmed the different pharmacokinetic profiles of DZ and DZ-CR due to different rates of absorption, yet characteristic accumulation of diazepam and its active metabolites during maintenance was seen with both formulations. The results suggest that DZ-CR capsule with less acute psychomotor impairment and steady pharmacokinetic profile would well suit to the treatment of anxiety for longer periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3070520     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1988.tb00970.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 0901-9928


  8 in total

1.  The influence of drug input rate on the development of tolerance to frusemide.

Authors:  M Wakelkamp; G Alván; H Scheinin; J Gabrielsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Christopher Louizos; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Subjective and behavioral effects of diazepam depend on its rate of onset.

Authors:  H de Wit; S Dudish; J Ambre
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Influence of drug formulation on drug concentration-effect relationships.

Authors:  G Castañeda-Hernández; G Caillé; P du Souich
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Diazepam effects on the performance of healthy subjects are not enhanced by treatment with the antihistamine ebastine.

Authors:  M J Mattila; K Aranko; T Kuitunen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  The use of microcomputer-based psychomotor tests for the evaluation of benzodiazepine effects on human performance: a review with emphasis on temazepam.

Authors:  G W Kunsman; J E Manno; B R Manno; C M Kunsman; M A Przekop
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Arousal and the pupil: why diazepam-induced sedation is not accompanied by miosis.

Authors:  R H Hou; E R Samuels; R W Langley; E Szabadi; C M Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Impact of psychotropic medications on simulated driving: a critical review.

Authors:  Mark J Rapoport; Melanie C Baniña
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.