Literature DB >> 30704784

Bone Graft Substitutes: Current Concepts and Future Expectations.

David C Lobb1, Brent R DeGeorge2, A Bobby Chhabra3.   

Abstract

Owing to its osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties and the presence of osteogenic cells, freshly harvested autologous bone graft is the gold standard for skeletal reconstruction where there is inadequate native bone. Whereas these characteristics are difficult to replicate, engineered, commercially available bone graft substitutes aim to achieve a comparable osseoregenerative profile. This work furnishes the reader with an understanding of the predominant classes of bone graft substitutes available for reconstruction of upper extremity bone defects following trauma or oncological surgery. We review bone graft substitutes with respect to their mechanisms of action, their advantages and disadvantages, and their indications and contraindications. We provide examples of bone graft substitutes in clinical use and outline comparative costs. We also describe the future directions for this specific aspect of reconstructive surgery with a focus on the role of bioactive glass.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone graft substitute; allograft; autograft

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30704784     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  20 in total

1.  Biodegradable Zn-2Ag-0.04Mg Alloy for Bone Regeneration In Vivo.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Haijun Xia; Xiaolei Fan; Hongzi Wu; Yi Liao; Feng Yuan
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Preparation of osteogenic matrices from cultured cells.

Authors:  Carl A Gregory; Eoin P McNeill; Simin Pan
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 1.441

3.  Shape memory polymer (SMP) scaffolds with improved self-fitting properties.

Authors:  Michaela R Pfau; Kelly G McKinzey; Abigail A Roth; Lance M Graul; Duncan J Maitland; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.331

4.  [Influence of different sintering temperatures on mesoporous structure and ectopic osteogenesis of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic granule materials].

Authors:  Dong Zhang; Xianlei Zong; Xiaoshuang Guo; Hong Du; Guodong Song; Xiaolei Jin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

5.  Local and systemic inflammation after implantation of a novel iron based porous degradable bone replacement material in sheep model.

Authors:  Bernd Wegener; Maik Behnke; Stefan Milz; Volkmar Jansson; Christian Redlich; Walter Hermanns; Christof Birkenmaier; Korbinian Pieper; Thomas Weißgärber; Peter Quadbeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Is extracellular matrix (ECM) a promising scaffold biomaterial for bone repair?

Authors:  Ranli Gu; Hao Liu; Yuan Zhu; Xuenan Liu; Siyi Wang; Yunsong Liu
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Smart scaffolds: shape memory polymers (SMPs) in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Michaela R Pfau; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 7.571

8.  The Development of Gelatin/Hyaluronate Copolymer Mixed with Calcium Sulfate, Hydroxyapatite, and Stromal-Cell-Derived Factor-1 for Bone Regeneration Enhancement.

Authors:  Yun-Liang Chang; Chia-Ying Hsieh; Chao-Yuan Yeh; Feng-Huei Lin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 9.  Local delivery of insulin/IGF-1 for bone regeneration: carriers, strategies, and effects.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Zhang; Helin Xing; Feng Qi; Hongchen Liu; Lizeng Gao; Xing Wang
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 10.  Graphene-Based Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of the Field and Considerations Regarding Biocompatibility and Biodegradation.

Authors:  Leila Daneshmandi; Mohammed Barajaa; Armin Tahmasbi Rad; Stefanie A Sydlik; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.