Literature DB >> 30703624

Understanding grower perceptions and attitudes on the use of nontraditional water sources, including reclaimed or recycled water, in the semi-arid Southwest United States.

Jessica L Dery1, Channah M Rock2, Rachel Rosenberg Goldstein3, Cathy Onumajuru4, Natalie Brassill5, Stevi Zozaya6, Mayhah R Suri7.   

Abstract

The use of nontraditional water sources, including reclaimed or recycled water, has become a desirable option to meet increasing demands in water stressed regions. In the Southwest United States, utilization of alternative water sources is becoming increasingly common, including use for landscape irrigation, environmental enhancement, cooling and power generation, potable reuse, and as a source water for agricultural irrigation. While much research has gone into identifying public perception towards water reuse schemes, little attention has been given to understanding grower attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge on the use of nontraditional water, including reclaimed water, in agriculture and how that may influence grower acceptance and production practices. This unique study utilized a needs assessment survey of growers (n = 521) within the Southwest region of the United States to gain an understanding of industry attitudes and needs regarding nontraditional water in agriculture. Results indicate that the majority of survey respondents were concerned with water availability (67.49%) yet less than half (48.30%) thought using a nontraditional water source in agriculture was 'very important'. Interestingly, respondents rated irrigation of 'food crops' third (42.20%) among agricultural activities for which they would be willing to use nontraditional water sources, behind irrigation of forage crops (61.60%) and dust control (61.60%). The importance of the use of nontraditional water sources in agriculture was influenced mostly by farm size (p = 0.007) and primary water source (p = 0.016), and the level of education was significant in respondent's level of concern over water availability (p = 0.021). Information on the quality of nontraditional water sources, showing that it is as good or better than respondents current sources, was found to shift rejection and uncertainty towards acceptance by 16.04%. The results of this study provide insight into perceived risks, willingness to use, drivers and constraints to grower adoption, and preferred methods of education regarding water reuse in agriculture. These findings can be used by water managers and planners to aid in the adoption of nontraditional waters, including reclaimed or recycled water, in agriculture thus extending water resources, securing food supplies, and protecting public health.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grower perception; Nontraditional water sources; Public perception; Reclaimed water; Recycled water; Water reuse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30703624     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  1 in total

1.  "Zooming" Our Way through Virtual Undergraduate Research Training: A Successful Redesign of the CONSERVE Summer Internship Program.

Authors:  Leena Malayil; Masoud Negahban-Azar; Rachel Rosenberg Goldstein; Manan Sharma; Jeanne Gleason; Amy Muise; Rianna Murray; Amy R Sapkota
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2021-03-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.