Literature DB >> 30703378

Similar softening across different racial and ethnic groups of smokers in California as smoking prevalence declined.

Margarete C Kulik1, Stanton A Glantz2.   

Abstract

Smoking prevalence differs among different racial/ethnic groups. Previous research found that as smoking prevalence declined in the U.S., remaining smokers made more quit attempts and smoked fewer cigarettes per day (CPD), indicating so-called softening. We examined California, a state with a highly diverse population, to assess whether there is differential softening among remaining smokers in different racial/ethnic groups. We used the California Tobacco Survey (1990-2008, N: 145,128). We ran logistic and linear regressions for smoking prevalence, CPD, quit attempts and time to first cigarette (30 min) as a function of race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, African American, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Korean, other Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native) controlling for other demographics. Overall prevalence fell from 21.1% in 1990 to 12.3% in 2008 (p < 0.01), showing similar declining trends across all racial/ethnic groups (p = 0.44), albeit from different baseline prevalence levels. In terms of softening indicators the proportion with at least one quit attempt in the past 12 months increased from 46.2% to 59.3%, a factor of 1.25 per decade (95%CI = 1.17, 1.34) in the adjusted model. CPD declined from 16.9 to 10.9, by -2.95 CPD per decade (95%CI = -3.24, -2.67) in the adjusted model. There were no significant changes in the time to first cigarette. Interactions of race/ethnicity and time show similar trends among all subgroups expect Hispanics, whose CPD remained stable rather than declining. Although from different baseline levels, tobacco control policies have benefitted all subgroups of California smokers, exhibiting similar softening as prevalence fell. Interventions are still needed to reduce the baseline differences.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quitting smoking; Racial/ethnic disparities; Tobacco control

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30703378      PMCID: PMC6400071          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  9 in total

Review 1.  Identifying health disparities across the tobacco continuum.

Authors:  Pebbles Fagan; Eric T Moolchan; Deirdre Lawrence; Anita Fernander; Paris K Ponder
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  The smoking population in the USA and EU is softening not hardening.

Authors:  Margarete C Kulik; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Changes in age trajectories of smoking experimentation during the California Tobacco Control Program.

Authors:  Karen Messer; John P Pierce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The quarter that changed the world.

Authors:  April Roeseler; David Burns
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Changing age-specific patterns of cigarette consumption in the United States, 1992-2002: association with smoke-free homes and state-level tobacco control activity.

Authors:  John P Pierce; Martha M White; Karen Messer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Light and intermittent smoking among California's Asian Americans.

Authors:  Elisa K Tong; Tung Nguyen; Eric Vittinghoff; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Softening Among U.S. Smokers With Psychological Distress: More Quit Attempts and Lower Consumption as Smoking Drops.

Authors:  Margarete C Kulik; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  What contributed to the major decline in per capita cigarette consumption during California's comprehensive tobacco control programme?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gilpin; Karen Messer; Martha M White; John P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  The effect of the California tobacco control program on smoking prevalence, cigarette consumption, and healthcare costs: 1989-2008.

Authors:  James Lightwood; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Uneven Access to Smoke-Free Laws and Policies and Its Effect on Health Equity in the United States: 2000-2019.

Authors:  Amy Y Hafez; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Margarete C Kulik; Maya Vijayaraghavan; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Smoking trends in Mexico, 2002-2016: before and after the ratification of the WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; David T Levy; Yan Kwan Lau; Rafael Meza; Daniela Sarahí Gutiérrez-Torres; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Nancy L Fleischer; James Thrasher
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  A cross-sectional investigation of softening indicators among South African smokers: Results from the South African Social Attitudes Survey between 2007 and 2018.

Authors:  Catherine O Egbe; Margarete C Kulik; Mukhethwa Londani; Senamile P Ngobese; Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.