Literature DB >> 30702985

Effect of individualized resistance training prescription with heart rate variability on individual muscle hypertrophy and strength responses.

Ramon Martins De Oliveira1, Carlos Ugrinowitsch2, James Derek Kingsley3, Deivid Gomes Da Silva1, Diego Bittencourt1, Flávia Rossi Caruso4, Audrey Borghi-Silva4, Cleiton Augusto Libardi1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate if resistance training (RT), performed with individualized recovery between sessions (RT-IND), promotes greater gains in strength and muscle mass and reduces the variability on adaptations compared to RT with fixed recovery intervals (RT-FIX). Twenty young men (age 21.9 ± 3.3 years) were randomized in the RT-IND and RT-FIX groups. Five days before the beginning of the training, measurements of the root mean square of successive R-R intervals differences (RMSSD) values of each individual were performed to establish the baseline values. Before each RT session, the RMSSD values determined whether the participants from RT-IND protocol were recovered from the previous session. Participants performed the RT session only if RMSSD values had returned to the baseline, otherwise they had to wait for an additional 24 h. RT-FIX performed an RT session every 48 h. Muscle strength was measured by one-maximal repetition (1-RM) test and muscle cross-section area (CSA) of the vastus laterals by ultrasonography were assessed pre- and post-training. 1-RM values increased significantly from pre to post-training for both groups (RT-IND: 30% and RT-FIX: 42%, main time effect, P < 0001), with no significant difference between groups. Muscle CSA increased significantly from pre to post-training (RT-IND: 15.7% and RT-FIX: 15.8%, main time effect, P < 0001), with no significant difference between groups. In conclusion, RT-IND did not increase the gains in muscle strength and mass neither reduce the variability in muscle adaptations when compared to the RT-FIX.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Muscle mass; RMSSD; autonomic nervous system; frequency; muscle strength

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30702985     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1572227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  4 in total

1.  Can Heart Rate Variability Determine Recovery Following Distinct Strength Loadings? A Randomized Cross-Over Trial.

Authors:  Antonia Thamm; Nils Freitag; Pedro Figueiredo; Kenji Doma; Christoph Rottensteiner; Wilhelm Bloch; Moritz Schumann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Heart Rate Variability, Neuromuscular and Perceptual Recovery Following Resistance Training.

Authors:  Andrew A Flatt; Liam Globensky; Evan Bass; Brooke L Sapp; Bryan L Riemann
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18

3.  HRV-Based Training for Improving VO2max in Endurance Athletes. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Granero-Gallegos; Alberto González-Quílez; Daniel Plews; María Carrasco-Poyatos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  High-Intensity Functional Training Guided by Individualized Heart Rate Variability Results in Similar Health and Fitness Improvements as Predetermined Training with Less Effort.

Authors:  Justin A DeBlauw; Nicholas B Drake; Brady K Kurtz; Derek A Crawford; Michael J Carper; Amanda Wakeman; Katie M Heinrich
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2021-12-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.