Vishnu Y Venugopalan1, Rohit Bhatia1, Jeyaraj Pandian2, Dheeraj Khurana3, Subhash Kaul4, P N Sylaja5, Deepti Arora2, Himani Khatter2, M V Padma1, Aneesh B Singhal6. 1. Department of Neurology, All-India Institutes of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 2. Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India. 3. Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. 4. Department of Neurology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India. 5. Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India. 6. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: India is a large country with geographically diverse populations and varying risk factors. Identification of regional differences can improve healthcare policy decisions. AIM: To study regional differences in stroke between North and South India. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Indo-US Collaborative Stroke Project, a National Institute of Health-funded multicentre prospective study conducted in five academic centers in India with a US-based coordinating center. Risk factors, severity, mechanisms, management, complications, and outcomes among ischemic stroke patients were compared between North and South Indian centers. RESULTS: Of the 2066 patients enrolled from North (n = 1060) and South India (n = 1006), North Indian patients were significantly older with fewer men and had lower rates of diabetes (32.8% vs. 38.7%, p < 0.01), dyslipidemia (3.5% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.01), tobacco use (27% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and alcohol use (30.1% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.01). North Indian patients had higher median National Institute of Health stroke scale scores (10 vs. 9, p < 0.01), more frequent large-artery atherosclerosis mechanism (34% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001), intravenous thrombolysis (14.0% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001), and lower rates of pneumonia (10.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.02). The three-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, 45.8% vs. 50.3%, p = 0.08) did not differ; however, North Indian patients had higher 90-day mortality (23.5% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The substantial regional differences in stroke risk factors and mechanisms may be partly explained by factors such as differing dietary habits and lifestyle, which can be addressed at a national level. Differences in acute and inpatient stroke care suggest a need for better adoption of national stroke management guidelines.
BACKGROUND: India is a large country with geographically diverse populations and varying risk factors. Identification of regional differences can improve healthcare policy decisions. AIM: To study regional differences in stroke between North and South India. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Indo-US Collaborative Stroke Project, a National Institute of Health-funded multicentre prospective study conducted in five academic centers in India with a US-based coordinating center. Risk factors, severity, mechanisms, management, complications, and outcomes among ischemic strokepatients were compared between North and South Indian centers. RESULTS: Of the 2066 patients enrolled from North (n = 1060) and South India (n = 1006), North Indian patients were significantly older with fewer men and had lower rates of diabetes (32.8% vs. 38.7%, p < 0.01), dyslipidemia (3.5% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.01), tobacco use (27% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and alcohol use (30.1% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.01). North Indian patients had higher median National Institute of Health stroke scale scores (10 vs. 9, p < 0.01), more frequent large-artery atherosclerosis mechanism (34% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001), intravenous thrombolysis (14.0% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001), and lower rates of pneumonia (10.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.02). The three-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, 45.8% vs. 50.3%, p = 0.08) did not differ; however, North Indian patients had higher 90-day mortality (23.5% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The substantial regional differences in stroke risk factors and mechanisms may be partly explained by factors such as differing dietary habits and lifestyle, which can be addressed at a national level. Differences in acute and inpatient stroke care suggest a need for better adoption of national stroke management guidelines.