Literature DB >> 30702322

Does the working alliance mediate the effect of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and alliance feedback on psychotherapy outcomes? A secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial.

Heidi Brattland1, John Morten Koksvik1, Olav Burkeland2, Christian A Klöckner3, Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera2, Scott D Miller4, Bruce Wampold5, Truls Ryum6, Valentina Cabral Iversen1.   

Abstract

Little is known about the mechanisms through which routine outcome monitoring (ROM) influences psychotherapy outcomes. In this secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial (Brattland et al., 2018), we investigated whether the working alliance mediated the effect of the Partners for Change Outcome Monitoring System (PCOMS), a ROM system that provides session-by-session feedback on clients' well-being and the alliance. Adult individuals (N = 170) referred for hospital-based outpatient mental health treatment were randomized to individual psychotherapy either with the PCOMS ROM system, or without (treatment as usual [TAU]). Treatment was provided by the same therapists (N = 20) in both conditions. A multilevel mediation model was developed to test if there was a significant indirect effect of ROM on client impairment at posttreatment through the alliance at 2 months' treatment controlled for first-session alliance. Alliance ratings increased more from session 1 to 2 months' treatment in the ROM than TAU condition, and alliance increase was associated with less posttreatment impairment. A significant indirect effect of ROM on treatment outcomes through alliance increase (p = .043) explained an estimated 23.0% of the effect of ROM on outcomes. The results were consistent with a theory of the alliance as one mechanism through which ROM works. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30702322     DOI: 10.1037/cou0000320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Couns Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0167


  5 in total

1.  Measurement-based care as a practice improvement tool: Clinical and organizational applications in youth mental health.

Authors:  Amanda Jensen-Doss; Susan Douglas; Dominique A Phillips; Ozgur Gencdur; Amber Zalman; Noelle Elena Gomez
Journal:  Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health       Date:  2020-08-18

2.  Improving treatment outcomes for adolescents with borderline personality disorder through a socioecological approach.

Authors:  Sune Bo; Carla Sharp; Mickey T Kongerslev; Patrick Luyten; Peter Fonagy
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Assessing the alliance-outcome association adjusted for patient characteristics and treatment processes: A meta-analytic summary of direct comparisons.

Authors:  Christoph Flückiger; A C Del Re; Daniel Wlodasch; Adam O Horvath; Nili Solomonov; Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2020-03-26

4.  Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Deanna E Wiebe; Shannon Remers; Pria Nippak; Julien Meyer
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Client-therapist dyads and therapy outcome: Does sex matching matters? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katja Petrowski; Elmar Brähler; Ileana Schmalbach; Cornelia Albani
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.