Literature DB >> 30702219

Neuroanatomy, the Achille's Heel of Medical Students. A Systematic Analysis of Educational Strategies for the Teaching of Neuroanatomy.

Maria Alessandra Sotgiu1, Vittorio Mazzarello1, Pasquale Bandiera1, Roberto Madeddu1, Andrea Montella1, Bernard Moxham2.   

Abstract

Neuroanatomy has been deemed crucial for clinical neurosciences. It has been one of the most challenging parts of the anatomical curriculum and is one of the causes of "neurophobia," whose main implication is a negative influence on the choice of neurology in the near future. In the last decades, several educational strategies have been identified to improve the skills of students and to promote a deep learning. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify the most effective method/s to teach human neuroanatomy. The search was restricted to publications written in English language and to articles describing teaching tools in undergraduate medical courses from January 2006 through December 2017. The primary outcome was the observation of improvement of anatomical knowledge in undergraduate medical students. Secondary outcomes were the amelioration of long-term retention knowledge and the grade of satisfaction of students. Among 18 selected studies, 44.4% have used three-dimensional (3D) teaching tools, 16.6% near peer teaching tool, 5.55% flipped classroom tool, 5.55% applied neuroanatomy elective course, 5.55% equivalence-based instruction-rote learning, 5.55% mobile augmented reality, 5.55% inquiry-based clinical case, 5.55% cadaver dissection, and 5.55% Twitter. The high in-between study heterogeneity was the main issue to identify the most helpful teaching tool to improve neuroanatomical knowledge among medical students. Data from this study suggest that a combination of multiple pedagogical resources seems to be the more advantageous for teaching neuroanatomy.
© 2019 American Association of Anatomists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knowledge retention; learning; medical education; medical students; neuroanatomy education; neuroscience; students satisfaction; teaching; undergraduate education

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30702219     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  6 in total

1.  Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualization: interest for neuroanatomy teaching in medical school.

Authors:  Timothée Jacquesson; Emile Simon; Corentin Dauleac; Loïc Margueron; Philip Robinson; Patrick Mertens
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Not All Electrode Channels Are Needed: Knowledge Transfer From Only Stimulated Brain Regions for EEG Emotion Recognition.

Authors:  Hayford Perry Fordson; Xiaofen Xing; Kailing Guo; Xiangmin Xu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimisation of the Peer-Led Flipped Model Using TEL Resources Within Neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Deepika Anbu; Alistair Robson; Octavia Kurn; Charles Taylor; Oliver Dean; December Payne; Eva Nagy; Charlotte Harrison; Samuel Hall; Scott Border
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  A historical perspective on training students to create standardized maps of novel brain structure: Newly-uncovered resonances between past and present research-based neuroanatomy curricula.

Authors:  Arshad M Khan; Christina E D'Arcy; Jeffrey T Olimpo
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.197

5.  A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy.

Authors:  Ben Kei Daniel; Mustafa Asil; Chris Wang; Prashanna Khwaounjoo; Yusuf Ozgur Cakmak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  E-Learning Three-Dimensional Anatomy of the Brainstem: Impact of Different Microscopy Techniques and Spatial Ability.

Authors:  Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum; Dylan J H A Henssen
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.