Literature DB >> 30702155

Interoceptive accuracy predicts nonplanning trait impulsivity.

Aleksandra M Herman1,2, Charlotte L Rae3,4, Hugo D Critchley3,4,5, Theodora Duka1,2.   

Abstract

Influential theories concerning personality argue that many impulsive individuals show physiological underarousal at rest. This interoceptive state is proposed to be egodystonic, motivating impulsive maladaptive actions to enhance arousal. However, there is little empirical research on this matter. The current study tested the relationship between physiological markers of arousal, measures of interoceptive (in)sensitivity, and trait impulsivity in a nonclinical sample of young adults. Experiment 1 investigated whether individuals (N = 31) with high trait impulsivity show decreased resting measures of arousal (indexed from heart rate, heart rate variability, and sympathetic electrodermal activity). Experiment 2 assessed whether trait impulsivity is linked to interoceptive abilities (N = 60). Overall, our results do not provide any compelling support for the underarousal theory of impulsivity. However, impaired interoceptive (cardiac discrimination) accuracy predicted the degree of Barratt nonplanning impulsivity, such that individuals with a better ability to distinguish between internal (bodily) and external signals manifest lower levels of nonplanning trait impulsivity. These findings open an avenue for potential novel interventions aimed at improving planning abilities via better interoceptive discrimination.
© 2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; heart rate; heart rate variability; interoception; skin conductance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30702155     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Linking perception of bodily states and cognitive control: the role of interoception in impulsive behaviour.

Authors:  Chiara Baiano; Gabriella Santangelo; Vincenzo Paolo Senese; Gianluca Di Mauro; Giusy Lauro; Marta Piacenti; Massimiliano Conson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Questionnaires of interoception do not assess the same construct.

Authors:  Luca Vig; Ferenc Köteles; Eszter Ferentzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Time evaluation and its accuracy in eating disorders: differences in relation to interoceptive awareness.

Authors:  Paolo Meneguzzo; Cecilia Mancini; Aurora Ormitti; Elisa Bonello; Patrizia Todisco
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.008

Review 4.  Alcohol use and interoception - A narrative review.

Authors:  Paweł Wiśniewski; Pierre Maurage; Andrzej Jakubczyk; Elisa M Trucco; Hubert Suszek; Maciej Kopera
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 5.067

5.  Associations between autonomic nervous system activity and risk-taking and internalizing behavior in young adolescents.

Authors:  Lisa Loheide-Niesmann; Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Susanne R De Rooij; Reinout W Wiers; Anja Huizink
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.016

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.