Literature DB >> 30701625

Transition zone prostate cancer: Logistic regression and machine-learning models of quantitative ADC, shape and texture features are highly accurate for diagnosis.

Mark Wu1, Satheesh Krishna2, Rebecca E Thornhill1, Trevor A Flood3, Matthew D F McInnes1, Nicola Schieda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The limitation of diagnosis of transition zone (TZ) prostate cancer (PCa) using subjective assessment of multiparametric (mp) MRI with PI-RADS v2 is related to overlapping features between cancers and stromal benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodules, particularly in small lesions.
PURPOSE: To evaluate modeling of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), texture, and shape features using logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) models for the diagnosis of transition zone PCa. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Ninety patients; 44 consecutive TZ PCa were compared with 61 consecutive BPH nodules (26 glandular/35 stromal). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T/T2 -weighted (T2 W) fast spin-echo, diffusion weighted imaging. ASSESSMENT: A radiologist manually segmented lesions on axial images for quantitative ADC (mean, 10th , 25th -centile-ADC), T2 W-shape (circularity, convexity) and T2 W-texture (kurtosis, skewness, entropy, run-length nonuniformity [RLNU], gray-level nonuniformity [GLNU]) analysis. A second radiologist segmented one-fifth of randomly selected lesions to determine the reproducibility of measurements. The reference standard was histopathology for all lesions. STATISTICAL TESTS: Quantitative features were selected a priori and were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. LR and SVM models of statistically significant features were constructed and evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Subgroup analysis of TZ PCa vs. only stromal BPH and in lesions measuring <15 mm was performed. Agreement in measurements was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).
RESULTS: Mean, 25th and 10th -centile ADC, circularity, and texture (entropy, RLNU, GLNU) features differed between groups (P < 0.0001-0.0058); however, at multivariate analysis only circularity and ADC metrics (P < 0.001) remained significant. LR and SVM models were highly accurate for the diagnosis of TZ PCa (sensitivity/specificity/AUC): 93.2%/98.4%/0.989 and 93.2%/96.7%/0.949, respectively, with no significance difference between the LR and SVM models (P = 0.2271). Reproducibility of segmentation was excellent (DSC 0.84 tumors and 0.87 BPH). Subgroup analyses of TZ PCa vs. stromal BPH (AUC = 0.976) and in <15 mm lesions (AUC = 0.990) remained highly accurate. DATA
CONCLUSION: LR and SVM models incorporating previously described quantitative ADC, shape and texture analysis features are highly accurate for the diagnosis of TZ PCa and remained accurate when comparing TZ PCa with stromal BPH and in smaller lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:940-950.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benign prostatic hyperplasia; magnetic resonance imaging; medical imaging; prostate; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30701625     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

1.  Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion Weighted Imaging May Improve Risk Stratification of Prostatic Transition Zone Lesions.

Authors:  Hannes Engel; Benedict Oerther; Marco Reisert; Elias Kellner; August Sigle; Christian Gratzke; Peter Bronsert; Tobias Krauss; Fabian Bamberg; Matthias Benndorf
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Discriminating low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from non-low-grade DCIS or DCIS upgraded to invasive carcinoma: effective texture features on ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Hiroyuki Abe; Shunji Mugikura; Minoru Miyashita; Yu Mori; Yo Oguma; Minami Hirasawa; Satoko Sato; Kei Takase
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 3.  Identification of Tumor-Specific MRI Biomarkers Using Machine Learning (ML).

Authors:  Rima Hajjo; Dima A Sabbah; Sanaa K Bardaweel; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

Review 4.  Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Renato Cuocolo; Maria Brunella Cipullo; Arnaldo Stanzione; Lorenzo Ugga; Valeria Romeo; Leonardo Radice; Arturo Brunetti; Massimo Imbriaco
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-08-07

Review 5.  Radiomic and Genomic Machine Learning Method Performance for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Leandro Pecchia; Monica Franzese; Rossana Castaldo; Carlo Cavaliere; Andrea Soricelli; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Multiparametric MRI may Help to Identify Patients With Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Clinical Bladder Outlet Obstruction Scheduled for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).

Authors:  Mike Wenzel; Maria N Welte; Lina Grossmann; Felix Preisser; Lena H Theissen; Clara Humke; Marina Deuker; Simon Bernatz; Philipp Gild; Sascha Ahyai; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Boris Bodelle; Luis A Kluth; Felix K H Chun; Philipp Mandel; Andreas Becker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Machine and Deep Learning Prediction Of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Elena Bertelli; Laura Mercatelli; Chiara Marzi; Eva Pachetti; Michela Baccini; Andrea Barucci; Sara Colantonio; Luca Gherardini; Lorenzo Lattavo; Maria Antonietta Pascali; Simone Agostini; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Machine Learning in Prostate MRI for Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Huanye Li; Chau Hung Lee; David Chia; Zhiping Lin; Weimin Huang; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jasper J Twilt; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Henkjan J Huisman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maarten de Rooij
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 10.  Radiomics in prostate cancer imaging for a personalized treatment approach - current aspects of methodology and a systematic review on validated studies.

Authors:  Simon K B Spohn; Alisa S Bettermann; Fabian Bamberg; Matthias Benndorf; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Tobias Fechter; Tobias Hölscher; Radu Grosu; Arturo Chiti; Anca L Grosu; Constantinos Zamboglou
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.