Mark Wu1, Satheesh Krishna2, Rebecca E Thornhill1, Trevor A Flood3, Matthew D F McInnes1, Nicola Schieda1. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Anatomical Pathology, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The limitation of diagnosis of transition zone (TZ) prostate cancer (PCa) using subjective assessment of multiparametric (mp) MRI with PI-RADS v2 is related to overlapping features between cancers and stromal benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodules, particularly in small lesions. PURPOSE: To evaluate modeling of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), texture, and shape features using logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) models for the diagnosis of transition zone PCa. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Ninety patients; 44 consecutive TZ PCa were compared with 61 consecutive BPH nodules (26 glandular/35 stromal). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T/T2 -weighted (T2 W) fast spin-echo, diffusion weighted imaging. ASSESSMENT: A radiologist manually segmented lesions on axial images for quantitative ADC (mean, 10th , 25th -centile-ADC), T2 W-shape (circularity, convexity) and T2 W-texture (kurtosis, skewness, entropy, run-length nonuniformity [RLNU], gray-level nonuniformity [GLNU]) analysis. A second radiologist segmented one-fifth of randomly selected lesions to determine the reproducibility of measurements. The reference standard was histopathology for all lesions. STATISTICAL TESTS: Quantitative features were selected a priori and were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. LR and SVM models of statistically significant features were constructed and evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Subgroup analysis of TZ PCa vs. only stromal BPH and in lesions measuring <15 mm was performed. Agreement in measurements was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS: Mean, 25th and 10th -centile ADC, circularity, and texture (entropy, RLNU, GLNU) features differed between groups (P < 0.0001-0.0058); however, at multivariate analysis only circularity and ADC metrics (P < 0.001) remained significant. LR and SVM models were highly accurate for the diagnosis of TZ PCa (sensitivity/specificity/AUC): 93.2%/98.4%/0.989 and 93.2%/96.7%/0.949, respectively, with no significance difference between the LR and SVM models (P = 0.2271). Reproducibility of segmentation was excellent (DSC 0.84 tumors and 0.87 BPH). Subgroup analyses of TZ PCa vs. stromal BPH (AUC = 0.976) and in <15 mm lesions (AUC = 0.990) remained highly accurate. DATA CONCLUSION: LR and SVM models incorporating previously described quantitative ADC, shape and texture analysis features are highly accurate for the diagnosis of TZ PCa and remained accurate when comparing TZ PCa with stromal BPH and in smaller lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:940-950.
BACKGROUND: The limitation of diagnosis of transition zone (TZ) prostate cancer (PCa) using subjective assessment of multiparametric (mp) MRI with PI-RADS v2 is related to overlapping features between cancers and stromal benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodules, particularly in small lesions. PURPOSE: To evaluate modeling of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), texture, and shape features using logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) models for the diagnosis of transition zone PCa. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Ninety patients; 44 consecutive TZ PCa were compared with 61 consecutive BPH nodules (26 glandular/35 stromal). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T/T2 -weighted (T2 W) fast spin-echo, diffusion weighted imaging. ASSESSMENT: A radiologist manually segmented lesions on axial images for quantitative ADC (mean, 10th , 25th -centile-ADC), T2 W-shape (circularity, convexity) and T2 W-texture (kurtosis, skewness, entropy, run-length nonuniformity [RLNU], gray-level nonuniformity [GLNU]) analysis. A second radiologist segmented one-fifth of randomly selected lesions to determine the reproducibility of measurements. The reference standard was histopathology for all lesions. STATISTICAL TESTS: Quantitative features were selected a priori and were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. LR and SVM models of statistically significant features were constructed and evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Subgroup analysis of TZ PCa vs. only stromal BPH and in lesions measuring <15 mm was performed. Agreement in measurements was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS: Mean, 25th and 10th -centile ADC, circularity, and texture (entropy, RLNU, GLNU) features differed between groups (P < 0.0001-0.0058); however, at multivariate analysis only circularity and ADC metrics (P < 0.001) remained significant. LR and SVM models were highly accurate for the diagnosis of TZ PCa (sensitivity/specificity/AUC): 93.2%/98.4%/0.989 and 93.2%/96.7%/0.949, respectively, with no significance difference between the LR and SVM models (P = 0.2271). Reproducibility of segmentation was excellent (DSC 0.84 tumors and 0.87 BPH). Subgroup analyses of TZ PCa vs. stromal BPH (AUC = 0.976) and in <15 mm lesions (AUC = 0.990) remained highly accurate. DATA CONCLUSION: LR and SVM models incorporating previously described quantitative ADC, shape and texture analysis features are highly accurate for the diagnosis of TZ PCa and remained accurate when comparing TZ PCa with stromal BPH and in smaller lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:940-950.
Authors: Hannes Engel; Benedict Oerther; Marco Reisert; Elias Kellner; August Sigle; Christian Gratzke; Peter Bronsert; Tobias Krauss; Fabian Bamberg; Matthias Benndorf Journal: In Vivo Date: 2022 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Leandro Pecchia; Monica Franzese; Rossana Castaldo; Carlo Cavaliere; Andrea Soricelli; Marco Salvatore Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Mike Wenzel; Maria N Welte; Lina Grossmann; Felix Preisser; Lena H Theissen; Clara Humke; Marina Deuker; Simon Bernatz; Philipp Gild; Sascha Ahyai; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Boris Bodelle; Luis A Kluth; Felix K H Chun; Philipp Mandel; Andreas Becker Journal: Front Surg Date: 2021-02-25
Authors: Elena Bertelli; Laura Mercatelli; Chiara Marzi; Eva Pachetti; Michela Baccini; Andrea Barucci; Sara Colantonio; Luca Gherardini; Lorenzo Lattavo; Maria Antonietta Pascali; Simone Agostini; Vittorio Miele Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Simon K B Spohn; Alisa S Bettermann; Fabian Bamberg; Matthias Benndorf; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Tobias Fechter; Tobias Hölscher; Radu Grosu; Arturo Chiti; Anca L Grosu; Constantinos Zamboglou Journal: Theranostics Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 11.556