Literature DB >> 30701297

Stress T1-mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and inducible myocardial ischemia.

Sebastian Bohnen1, Lennard Prüßner2, E Vettorazzi3, Ulf K Radunski2, Enver Tahir4, Jan Schneider2, Ersin Cavus2, Maxim Avanesov4, Christian Stehning5, Gerhard Adam4, Stefan Blankenberg2, Gunnar K Lund4, Kai Muellerleile2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alterations in native myocardial T1 under vasodilation stress ("T1 reactivity") were recently proposed as a non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) method to detect myocardial ischemia. This study evaluated the performance of a segmental, truly non-contrast stress T1 mapping CMR approach to detect inducible ischemia. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One-hundred patients with suspected/known coronary artery disease underwent CMR at 3.0 or 1.5 T. T1 mapping was performed using the 5s(3s)3s-modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) sequence at rest and under regadenoson stress. We defined T1 reactivity as the change in native T1 from rest to stress (1) in the 16-segment AHA model independent from perfusion images and (2) in focal regions of interest that were copied from perfusion images to T1 maps. We compared T1 reactivity between segments/regions with inducible ischemia, scar, and remote myocardium for both approaches. Segmental T1 reactivity was significantly lower in segments including inducible ischemia [- 1.15 (95% CI, - 2.16 to - 0.14)%] compared to remote segments [2.49 (95% CI, 1.87 to 3.11)%; p < 0.001]. Focal T1 reactivity was also significantly lower [- 2.65 (95% CI, - 3.84 to - 1.46)%] in regions with stress-perfusion defects compared to remote regions [4.72 (95% CI, 3.90 to 5.54)%; p < 0.001]. However, the performance of segmental T1 reactivity to depict inducible ischemia was significantly inferior compared to the focal approach (AUCs 0.68 versus 0.85; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardium with inducible ischemia is characterized by the absence of significant T1 reactivity, but a clinically applicable approach for truly non-contrast stress T1 mapping remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMR; Ischemia; T1 mapping; T1 reactivity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30701297     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-019-01421-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  11 in total

1.  FIFA World Cup 2018: effect of emotional stress on conventional heart rate variability metrics.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hamm; Viktoria Bogner-Flatz; Axel Bauer; Stefan Brunner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Clinical, angiographic and echocardiographic correlates of epicardial and microvascular spasm in patients with myocardial ischaemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries.

Authors:  Rocco Antonio Montone; Giampaolo Niccoli; Michele Russo; Marta Giaccari; Marco Giuseppe Del Buono; Maria Chiara Meucci; Filippo Gurguglione; Rocco Vergallo; Domenico D'Amario; Antonino Buffon; Antonio M Leone; Francesco Burzotta; Cristina Aurigemma; Carlo Trani; Giovanna Liuzzo; Gaetano A Lanza; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Myocardial blood flow is the dominant factor influencing cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine stress T2.

Authors:  Jill J Weyers; Venkat Ramanan; Ahsan Javed; Jennifer Barry; Melissa Larsen; Krishna Nayak; Graham A Wright; Nilesh R Ghugre
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Native T1 mapping for differentiating the histopathologic type, grade, and stage of rectal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Juan Li; Xuemei Gao; Marcel Dominik Nickel; Jingliang Cheng; Jinxia Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.605

Review 5.  Myocardial T1 and ECV Measurement: Underlying Concepts and Technical Considerations.

Authors:  Austin A Robinson; Kelvin Chow; Michael Salerno
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18

Review 6.  Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Trends in technical development and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Brendan L Eck; Scott D Flamm; Deborah H Kwon; W H Wilson Tang; Claudia Prieto Vasquez; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 9.795

7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress and rest T1-mapping using regadenoson for detection of ischemic heart disease compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Matthew K Burrage; Mayooran Shanmuganathan; Ambra Masi; Evan Hann; Qiang Zhang; Iulia A Popescu; Rajkumar Soundarajan; Joana Leal Pelado; Kelvin Chow; Stefan Neubauer; Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance T1 reactivity for depiction of myocardial hypoperfusion.

Authors:  Caroline M Colbert; Anna H Le; Jiaxin Shao; Jesse W Currier; Olujimi A Ajijola; Peng Hu; Kim-Lien Nguyen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.478

9.  Cardiac stress T1-mapping response and extracellular volume stability of MOLLI-based T1-mapping methods.

Authors:  Matthew K Burrage; Mayooran Shanmuganathan; Qiang Zhang; Evan Hann; Iulia A Popescu; Rajkumar Soundarajan; Kelvin Chow; Stefan Neubauer; Vanessa M Ferreira; Stefan K Piechnik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Non-contrast myocardial perfusion in rest and exercise stress using systolic flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery.

Authors:  Markus Henningsson; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers; Johan Kihlberg
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.