Literature DB >> 30700834

Motivations for data sharing-views of research participants from four European countries: A DIRECT study.

Nisha Shah1, Victoria Coathup2, Harriet Teare2, Ian Forgie3, Giuseppe Nicola Giordano4, Tue Haldor Hansen5, Lenka Groeneveld6, Michelle Hudson7, Ewan Pearson8, Hartmut Ruetten9, Jane Kaye2,10.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore and compare different countries in what motivated research participants' decisions whether to share their de-identified data. We investigated European DIRECT (Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification) research project participants' desire for control over sharing different types of their de-identified data, and with who data could be shared in the future after the project ends. A cross-sectional survey was disseminated among DIRECT project participants. The results found that there was a significant association between country and attitudes towards advancing research, protecting privacy, and beliefs about risks and benefits to sharing data. When given the choice to have control, some participants (<50% overall) indicated that having control over what data is shared and with whom was important; and control over what data types are shared was less important than respondents deciding who data are shared with. Danish respondents indicated higher odds of desire to control data types shared, and Dutch respondents showed higher odds of desire to control who data will be shared with. Overall, what research participants expect in terms of control over data sharing needs to be considered and aligned with sharing for future research and re-use of data. Our findings show that even with de-identified data, respondents prioritise privacy above all else. This study argues to move research participants from passive participation in biomedical research to considering their opinions about data sharing and control of de-identified biomedical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30700834      PMCID: PMC6461907          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0344-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  9 in total

1.  Public Views About Involvement in Decision-Making on Health Data Sharing, Access, Use and Reuse: The Importance of Trust in Science and Other Institutions.

Authors:  Ngozi Nwebonyi; Susana Silva; Cláudia de Freitas
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Meredith Parsons; Heidi Walsh; Kari Baldwin; Tristan McIntosh; James M DuBois
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2020-03

3.  Connected Health User Willingness to Share Personal Health Data: Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Maria Karampela; Sofia Ouhbi; Minna Isomursu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  User-focused data sharing agreements: a foundation for the genomic future.

Authors:  Carolyn Petersen
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2019-10-01

5.  Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.

Authors:  Alicia VandeVusse; Jennifer Mueller; Sebastian Karcher
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Katja Mehlis; Eva C Winkler; Anja Köngeter; Christoph Schickhardt; Martin Jungkunz; Susanne Bergbold
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.076

7.  Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe.

Authors:  Michael Morrison; Miranda Mourby; Heather Gowans; Sarah Coy; Jane Kaye
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2020-11-16

8.  "Who is watching the watchdog?": ethical perspectives of sharing health-related data for precision medicine in Singapore.

Authors:  Tamra Lysaght; Angela Ballantyne; Vicki Xafis; Serene Ong; Gerald Owen Schaefer; Jeffrey Min Than Ling; Ainsley J Newson; Ing Wei Khor; E Shyong Tai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 9.  Patients' and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  Shona Kalkman; Johannes van Delden; Amitava Banerjee; Benoît Tyl; Menno Mostert; Ghislaine van Thiel
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.