| Literature DB >> 30700797 |
Hidekazu Yoshida1, Yoshihiro Asahara2, Koshi Yamamoto2, Nagayoshi Katsuta3, Masayo Minami4, Richard Metcalfe5.
Abstract
Isolated spherical carbonate concretions are frequently observed in finer grained marine sediments of widely varying geological age. Recent studies on various kinds of spherical carbonate (CaCO3) concretions revealed that they formed very rapidly under tightly constrained conditions. However, the formation ages of the isolated spherical carbonate concretions have never been determined. Here we use 87Sr/86Sr ratios to determine the ages of these spherical concretions. The studied concretions formed in the Yatsuo Group of Miocene age in central Japan. Some formed post-mortem around tusk-shells (Fissidentalium spp.), while other concretions have no shell fossils inside. The deformation of sedimentary layers around the concretions, combined with geochemical analyses, reveal that Sr was incorporated into the CaCO3 concretions during their rapid formation. Strontium isotopic stratigraphy using 87Sr/86Sr ratios of all concretions indicates an age of 17.02 ± 0.27 Ma, with higher accuracy than the ages estimated using micro-fossils from the Yatsuo Group. The results imply that the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of isolated spherical carbonate concretions can be applied generally to determine the numerical ages of marine sediments, when concretions formed soon after sedimentation. The 87Sr/86Sr age determinations have high accuracy, even in cases without any fossils evidence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30700797 PMCID: PMC6353912 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38593-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Ca and Sr distribution in and around the tusk-shell concretion. (a) Occurrence of a tusk-shell concretion formed around the mouth of a tusk-shell (Fissidentalium spp.) and, (b) a cross section through the tusk-shell showing the internal texture. (c,d) SXAM Ca and Sr X-ray intensity in and around the cut surface of a tusk-shell concretion. A sharp boundary between the concretion and matrix is also defined by the both elemental distribution. Index map is based on the data of Geospatial Information Authority of Japan website (http://www.gsi.go.jp/ENGLISH/index.html). Figures a–c are referred from Yoshida et al.[3]. All photographs (a,b) shown here are taken by H. Yoshida.
Major and trace element concentrations in concretions and buried matrices.
| Concretion part | Matrix part | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111401 | 111403 | 111404 | 111405 | 111406 | 111409 | 111407 | 111408 | 111410 | |
| (01*) | (02*) | (03*) | (04*) | (05*) | (−) | (06*) | (07*) | (08*) | |
| SiO2 | 28.79 | 34.03 | 31.64 | 28.05 | 33.83 | 35.91 | 62.54 | 62.14 | 60.43 |
| TiO2 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| Al2O3 | 6.68 | 8.15 | 7.43 | 6.46 | 8.08 | 8.73 | 17.79 | 17.51 | 17.14 |
| Fe2O3 | 2.21 | 2.55 | 2.48 | 2.15 | 2.49 | 2.60 | 6.90 | 7.36 | 6.95 |
| MnO | 0.63 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.69 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| MgO | 2.93 | 3.01 | 3.08 | 2.85 | 2.98 | 2.78 | 2.43 | 2.42 | 2.34 |
| CaO | 51.67 | 45.71 | 48.34 | 52.12 | 46.01 | 43.00 | 3.99 | 3.84 | 4.04 |
| Na2O | 0.70 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 1.86 | 1.92 | 1.95 |
| K2O | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.89 | 1.05 | 1.79 | 1.78 | 1.75 |
| P2O5 | 2.39 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 2.96 | 1.07 | 0.97 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Total (wt%) | 96.91 | 97.07 | 96.45 | 96.84 | 97.00 | 96.82 | 98.38 | 98.03 | 95.65 |
| Cr | 0.1 | 7.6 | 7.5 | tr. | 6.7 | 14 | 54 | 56 | 52 |
| Co | 5.3 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 6.5 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| Ni | tr. | tr. | tr. | tr. | tr. | 6.1 | 24 | 25 | 25 |
| Cu | tr. | 5.2 | 0.7 | tr. | 2.1 | 2.0 | 26 | 24 | 25 |
| Zn | 25 | 34 | 30 | 23 | 33 | 43 | 109 | 112 | 116 |
| Ga | 2.1 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 19 | 20 | 19 |
| Rb | 14 | 19 | 17 | 14 | 19 | 24 | 70 | 71 | 69 |
| Sr | 880 | 880 | 900 | 850 | 890 | 950 | 370 | 350 | 370 |
| Y | 79 | 83 | 74 | 89 | 85 | 64 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| Zr | 67 | 86 | 80 | 63 | 84 | 88 | 200 | 210 | 200 |
| Nb | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 6.3 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Pb | 7.1 | 8.5 | 10.4 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 8.1 | 39 | 35 | 38 |
| Th (ppm) | 7.3 | 7.3 | 8.5 | 7.3 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 10 | 10 | 9.0 |
| Ig.Loss (wt%) | 32.34 | 30.63 | 31.51 | 32.62 | 30.52 | 29.27 | 12.12 | 12.30 | 12.05 |
Major and trace element concentrations in concretions and buried matrices determined by XRF. Major elements are expressed in % and trace ones are in ppm. Values of Total (wt%) are the total percentage of major elements in the sample after loss on ignition. Data for major element compositions are partly from Yoshida et al.[3].
tr.: trace (below detection limit).
*Sample number shown in major elements are referred from Supplementary Table 3 of Yoshida et al.[3].
Sr isotopic ratios and the corresponding numerical ages of calcite and aragonite fractions in the carbonate concretions.
| Sample | fraction | 87Sr/86Srmeasured*,a | 87Sr/86Srcorrected*,b | age (Ma)*,c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 111401 | calcite | 0.708664 +/− 0.000013 | 0.708651 | |
| 111403 | calcite | 0.708662 +/− 0.000013 | 0.708648 | |
| 111404 | calcite | 0.708670 +/− 0.000014 | 0.708657 | |
| 111405 | calcite | 0.708678 +/− 0.000011 | 0.708665 | |
| 111406 | calcite | 0.708685 +/− 0.000013 | 0.708671 | |
| 111409 | calcite | 0.708664 +/− 0.000014 | 0.708651 | |
| | 0.708657 +/− 0.000009 | 17.08 (+0.27, −0.28) | ||
|
| ||||
| 0708-01 | calcite | 0.708670 +/− 0.000011 | 0.708657 | |
| 0708-02 | calcite | 0.708657 +/− 0.000014 | 0.708645 | |
| 0708-03 | calcite | 0.708694 +/− 0.000013 | 0.708682 | |
| 0708-04 | calcite | 0.708689 +/− 0.000011 | 0.708676 | |
| 0708-05 | calcite | 0.708676 +/− 0.000011 | 0.708664 | |
| | 0.708665 +/− 0.000014 | 16.95 (+0.36, −0.37) | ||
|
| 0.708661 +/− 0.000009 | 17.02 (+0.27, −0.27) | ||
|
| ||||
| a1 | aragonite | 0.708694 +/− 0.000014 | 0.708680 | |
| 1996-01 | aragonite | 0.708667 +/− 0.000014 | 0.708654 | |
| 2014-01 | aragonite | 0.708682 +/− 0.000013 | 0.708669 | |
| 2015-01 | aragonite | 0.708687 +/− 0.000013 | 0.708675 | |
| | 0.708670 +/− 0.000012 | 16.86 (+0.34, −0.34) | ||
|
| ||||
| 111407 | calcite | 0.709135 +/− 0.000013 | 0.709121 | |
| 111408 | calcite | 0.708639 +/− 0.000014 | 0.708626 | |
| 111410 | calcite | 0.708706 +/− 0.000011 | 0.708693 | |
Strontium isotopic ratios, 87Sr/86Sr, of calcite or aragonite fractions from the tusk-shell concretions, concretions without fossil, host rock matrices and tusk-shells from the Yatsuo Group are shown. Based on the Sr isotopic stratigraphy, the numerical ages for the tusk-shell concretions, concretions without fossils, and tusk-shells are determined to be 17.08 (+0.27, −0.28) Ma, 16.95 (+0.36, −0.37) Ma and 16.86 ± 0.34 Ma and are fairly consistent with each other. An averaged age of concretions with tusk-shell and without fossil is 17.02 ± 0.27 Ma.
*,aThe errors are 2 SE level on single measurements.
*,bThe repeated analysis of NIST-SRM987 during this study gives the value of 0.710261 ± 0.000005 (2 SE, n = 14). 87Sr/86Sr ratio is normalized to NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 987 value (=0.710248). Averaged 87Sr/86Sr ratios for calcite fractions in concretions with tusk-shell, those without fossils, both of the calcites, and aragonite fractions of tusk-shells are presented with 2 SE. Each error of the 87Sr/86Sr ratio includes both error for repeated analysis of the samples and that of NIST-SRM987, that is error propagation. See “METHOD SUMMARY” in detail.
*,cAges are determined by the method of McArthur et al.[13]. The age error for each calcite/aragonite sample is based on 2 SE for the repeated analysis of multiple samples and that of NIST-SRM987.
Sr isotopic ratios of silicate fractions of carbonate concretions.
| Sample | fraction | 87Sr/86Srmeasured*,a | 87Sr/86Srcorrected*,b |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 111401 | silicate | 0.707611 +/− 0.000011 | 0.707598 |
| 111403 | silicate | 0.707640 +/− 0.000013 | 0.707627 |
| 111404 | silicate | 0.707683 +/− 0.000014 | 0.707670 |
| 111405 | silicate | 0.707673 +/− 0.000014 | 0.707659 |
| 111406 | silicate | 0.707695 +/− 0.000013 | 0.707681 |
| 111409 | silicate | 0.707621 +/− 0.000013 | 0.707608 |
|
| |||
| 111407 | silicate | 0.707601 +/− 0.000011 | 0.707588 |
| 111408 | silicate | 0.707448 +/− 0.000011 | 0.707434 |
| 111410 | silicate | 0.707426 +/− 0.000014 | 0.707413 |
Sr isotopic ratios of the silicate fractions from the concretions and surrounding matrices are clearly different from the range of values given by the calcite/aragonite fractions.
*,aThe errors are 2 SE level on single measurements.
87Sr/86Sr ratio is normalized to NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 987 value (=0.710248). *,bThe value of repeated analysis of NIST-SRM987 during this study was 0.710261 ± 0.000005 (2 SE, n = 14).
Figure 2Sr isotopic stratigraphy and numerical age determination by concretions. (a) Numerical age determined by Sr stratigraphy based on the well-known 87Sr/86Sr variations of seawater during the Paleogene to the present[12,13] with the accuracy within ±0.1~0.2 Ma. (b) The age of the tusk-shell concretions and concretions without fossils from Yatsuo Group lie within a narrow range of 17.02 ± 0.27 Ma based on the Sr isotopic stratigraphy. The centre, lower and upper lines (black, blue and red) show a best-fit line, lower-age and upper-age limits on the Sr-isotope curve[13], respectively.