| Literature DB >> 30700692 |
Feng Wu1, Jian Ding1, Huai-Bin Li1, Hua-Chun Miao1, Rui Bao1, Shan Yang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on expression of the D1 receptor (D1R), phosphorylation of extracellular-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (p-ERK1/2) and c-Fos in the insular cortex (IC) of ketamine-addicted rats. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 7 groups: the normal group, the normal saline (NS) group, the ketamine (Ket) group, the U0126+Ket group, the SCH23390+Ket group, the Ket+acupoints EA (EA1) group, and the Ket+ non-acupoints EA (EA2) group. We used immunohistochemistry to detect the expression of D1R, p-ERK1/2, and c-Fos. We also used Nissl staining techniques to study the morphology of IC neurons. RESULTS Our study demonstrated that the ketamine group had sparsely distributed neurons, large intracellular vacuoles, nuclei shift, and unclear nucleolus. The number of Nissl-positive (neuronal) cells in the ketamine group were decreased than in the normal group. Our results also indicated that there was significantly lower expression of D1R, p-ERK1/2, and c-Fos in the IC of the U0126+Ket group, SCH23390+Ket group, and Ket+EA1 group as compared with that of the Ket group. CONCLUSIONS Ketamine addiction induces c-Fos overexpression in the IC by increasing the expression of D1R and p-ERK1/2. Acupoints EA downregulate D1R and p-ERK1/2 by reducing the overexpression of c-Fos.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30700692 PMCID: PMC6369650 DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.913285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit Basic Res ISSN: 2325-4394
Comparison of number of Nissl-positive cells among different groups (χ±s, n=6).
| Group | Count of Nissl-positive cells |
|---|---|
| Normal group | 52.17±2.14 |
| NS group | 51.33±2.88 |
| Ket group | 31.17±2.32 |
| U0126+Ket group | 49.50±3.21 |
| SCH23390+Ket group | 51.50±2.43 |
| Ket+EA1 group | 44.67±2.16 |
| Ket+EA2 group | 31.17±2.32 |
Compared with the normal group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket+EA1 group, P<0.05.
Figure 1The expression of Nissl-positive cells in IC in each group of rats (Nissl, ×400).
Comparison of number of D1R positive cells among different groups (χ±s, n=6).
| Group | Count of D1R-positive cells |
|---|---|
| Normal group | 8.83±1.47 |
| NS group | 9.67±1.75 |
| Ket group | 20.17±2.14 |
| U0126+Ket group | 4.33±1.03 |
| SCH23390+Ket group | 4.17±0.98 |
| Ket+EA1 group | 13.33±1.03 |
| Ket+EA2 group | 21.50±1.52 |
Compared with the normal group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket+EA1 group, P<0.05.
Comparison of number of p-ERK1/2 positive cells among different groups (χ±s, n=6).
| Group | Count of p-ERK1/2-positive cells |
|---|---|
| Normal group | 7.33±1.21 |
| NS group | 8.67±1.37 |
| Ket group | 13.33±1.37 |
| U0126+Ket group | 3.83±0.75 |
| SCH23390+Ket group | 4.33±1.03 |
| Ket+EA1 group | 8.67±1.63 |
| Ket+EA2 group | 14.17±1.17 |
Compared with the normal group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket+EA1 group, P<0.05.
Comparison of number of c-Fos positive cells among different groups (χ±s, n=6).
| Group | Count of c-Fos-positive cells |
|---|---|
| Normal group | 5.33±1.03 |
| NS group | 5.67±0.82 |
| Ket group | 16.33±1.03 |
| U0126+Ket group | 4.33±1.03 |
| SCH23390+Ket group | 5.50±1.05 |
| Ket+EA1 group | 6.17±1.17 |
| Ket+EA2 group | 13.83±0.98 |
Compared with the normal group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket group, P<0.05;
compared with the Ket+EA1 group, P<0.05.
Figure 2The expression of D1R positive cells in IC in each group of rats (IR, ×400).
Figure 3The expression of p-ERK1/2 positive cells in IC in each group of rats (IR, ×400).
Figure 4The expression of c-Fos positive cells in IC in each group of rats (IR, ×400).