| Literature DB >> 30700253 |
Zhaofeng Hou1,2,3,4, Dandan Liu1,2,3,4, Shijie Su1,2,3,4, Lele Wang1,2,3,4, Zhenxing Zhao1,2,3,4, Yifei Ma1,2,3,4, Qiaoqiao Li1,2,3,4, Chuanli Jia1,2,3,4, Jinjun Xu1,2,3,4, Yonghua Zhou5, Jianping Tao6,7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular parasite that infects humans and other warm-blooded animals. Previous quantitative proteomic analyses of infected host cells revealed that the expression of many host proteins is modulated by T. gondii infection. However, at present limited data are available on the differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) associated with the pathology and host immune responses induced by acute and chronic infection with T. gondii in pigs in vivo. In this study, high-throughput sequencing was used to investigate expression profiles of spleen miRNAs at 10, 25 and 50 days post-infection (DPI) in pigs infected with Chinese I genotype strain T. gondii isolated from a dead pig.Entities:
Keywords: Acute and chronic infection; Host regulation; Pig; Spleen; Toxoplasma gondii; microRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30700253 PMCID: PMC6354428 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5458-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Histopathology of tissue sections prepared from pig spleens by HE staining. a and (c) represents the spleens prepared from pigs in the infected group. b and (d) represents the spleens prepared from pigs of the control group. The part marked with a red box in (c) was enlarged, and T. gondii tachyzoites were indicated with an arrow. a and (b), bar = 200 μm; (c) and (d), bar = 50 μm
The list of data filtering (%)
| Library | Total reads | N% > 10% | Low quality | 5′ contamine | 3′ null or insert null | With ployA/T/G/C | Clean reads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SI-10 | 13,929,425 (100.00) | 611 (0.00) | 27,246 (0.20) | 480 (0.00) | 156,647 (1.12) | 8824 (0.06) | 13,735,617 (98.61) |
| SI-25 | 13,143,459 (100.00) | 102 (0.00) | 11,794 (0.09) | 625 (0.00) | 317,578 (2.42) | 13,064 (0.10) | 12,800,296 (97.39) |
| SI-50 | 11,569,642 (100.00) | 135 (0.00) | 10,968 (0.09) | 140 (0.00) | 120,137 (1.04) | 4400 (0.04) | 11,433,862 (98.83) |
| SC-10 | 14,250,850 (100.00) | 530 (0.00) | 29,766 (0.21) | 695 (0.00) | 209,549 (1.47) | 28,198 (0.20) | 13,982,112 (98.11) |
| SC-25 | 11,741,170 (100.00) | 104 (0.00) | 10,780 (0.09) | 481 (0.00) | 286,719 (2.44) | 10,845 (0.09) | 11,432,241 (97.37) |
| SC-50 | 13,207,225 (100.00) | 559 (0.00) | 40,020 (0.30) | 993 (0.01) | 228,722 (1.73) | 5731 (0.04) | 12,931,200 (97.91) |
Fig. 2The annotation statistics of the unique reads from samples in each group. ‘exon +’ or ‘exon -’ represents small RNA derived from sense or antisense of exon, respectively; ‘intron +’ or ‘intron -’ represents small RNA derived from sense or antisense of intron, respectively; ‘other’ represents the unannotated small RNA
The known and novel miRNAs mapped in pig genome
| miRNA | Types | Total | sRNA Libraries | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SI-10 | SI-25 | SI-50 | SC-10 | SC-25 | SC-50 | |||
| Known miRNAs | Mapped mature | 307 | 291 | 289 | 279 | 285 | 295 | 282 |
| Mapped hairpin | 291 | 282 | 278 | 273 | 272 | 282 | 277 | |
| Mapped unique sRNA | 23,917 | 4366 | 4458 | 3306 | 3875 | 4155 | 3757 | |
| Mapped total sRNA | 29,387,126 | 6,220,575 | 5,053,714 | 4,663,061 | 2,825,377 | 4,676,267 | 5,948,132 | |
| Novel miRNAs | Mapped mature | 198 | 110 | 105 | 68 | 78 | 98 | 121 |
| Mapped star | 53 | 27 | 17 | 17 | 21 | 19 | 27 | |
| Mapped hairpin | 212 | 126 | 113 | 79 | 92 | 106 | 129 | |
| Mapped unique sRNA | 1172 | 245 | 200 | 125 | 148 | 201 | 253 | |
| Mapped total sRNA | 2697 | 534 | 422 | 255 | 325 | 450 | 711 | |
Fig. 3The correlation analysis between samples in different groups. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to estimate the association of expression levels between samples
Fig. 4The differential expression analysis of pig spleen miRNAs between the infected and control groups. a The number of DEMs between the infected and control groups. b The venn diagrams of the DEMs between the infected and control groups
Fig. 5The GO enrichment analysis for target genes of DEMs. a The significant enriched GO terms of biological process, cellular component and molecular function for target genes of DEMs at 10 DPI. b The significant enriched GO terms of biological process, cellular component and molecular function for target genes of DEMs at 50 DPI
Fig. 6The KEGG enrichment analysis for target genes of DEMs. The top 20 KEGG pathways of differentially expressed miRNAs in pig spleen between the infected and control groups at 10 (a), 25 (b) and 50 (c) DPI. Rich factor indicates the ratio of target genes of DEMs enriched in the pathway among genes annotated in the pathway. d The venn diagram of the significant enriched pathways between the infected and control groups (P < 0.05)
Fig. 7The network analysis of the interaction between the DEMs and their potential target genes. The node shapes were used for representing the different miRNAs or target genes, which were connected by edges (negative interaction between miRNA to target gene). And the colours of spherical nodes were represented the upregulated miRNAs or downregulated ones in porcine spleen at different time points. a, b and c The interaction between the cytokines and the DEMs in pig spleens at different time points after T. gondii infection. d and e The interaction between the C-type lectins and the DEMs in pig spleens
The sequences of miRNAs used for RT-qPCR validation
| miRNAs | Sequences |
|---|---|
| ssc-miR-361-3p | CCCCCAGGUGUGAUUCUGAUUUGC |
| ssc-miR-185 | UGGAGAGAAAGGCAGUUCCUGA |
| ssc-miR-500 | AUGCACCUGGGCAAGGAUUCU |
| ssc-miR-486 | UCCUGUACUGAGCUGCCCCGAG |
| ssc-miR-127 | UCGGAUCCGUCUGAGCUUGGCU |
| ssc-miR-210 | CUGUGCGUGUGACAGCGGCUGA |
| ssc-novel-154 | GUGGUUAGUACUCUGCCUUA |
| ssc-miR-122 | UGGAGUGUGACAAUGGUGUUUGU |
| ssc-miR-182 | UUUGGCAAUGGUAGAACUCACACU |
| ssc-miR-17-5p | CAAAGUGCUUACAGUGCAGGUAG |
| ssc-miR-20a | UAAAGUGCUUAUAGUGCAGGUA |
| ssc-miR-542-3p | UGUGACAGAUUGAUAACUGAAA |
| ssc-miR-149 | UCUGGCUCCGUGUCUUCACUCCC |
| ssc-miR-30b-3p | CUGGGAGGUGGAUGUUUACUU |
| ssc-miR-296-3p | AGGGUUGGGCGGAGGCUUUCC |
| ssc-miR-504 | AGACCCUGGUCUGCACUCUAUCU |
| ssc-miR-129a-3p | AAGCCCUUACCCCAAAAAGCAU |
| ssc-miR-2320-5p | UGGCACAGGGUCCAGCUGUCGG |
| ssc-miR-328 | CUGGCCCUCUCUGCCCUUCCGU |
| ssc-let-7c | UGAGGUAGUAGGUUGUAUGGUU |
| ssc-miR-7138-5p | UCCCAGCAAGUGUCCAUCCAUCU |
| ssc-miR-493-5p | UUGUACAUGGUAGGCUUUCAUU |
| ssc-let-7a | UGAGGUAGUAGGUUGUAUAGUU |
| ssc-novel-262 | UGAGCCACAGAAACUCCAGGACU |
Fig. 8Sequencing data validated by RT-qPCR. a The expression level of differentially expressed miRNAs validated by RT-qPCR. MicroRNA expression was quantified relative to the expression level of U6 using the comparative cycle threshold (ΔCT) method. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. b Comparison of the expression pattern of the sequencing data and RT-qPCR data. Log2 (fold change) > 0 indicates the transcript upregulated in infection group compared to the control group. Log2 (fold change) < 0 indicates the transcript downregulated in infection group compared to the control group