Literature DB >> 30700220

Pathology of Bioabsorbable Implants in Preclinical Studies.

Serge D Rousselle1, Yuval Ramot2, Abraham Nyska3, Nicolette D Jackson4.   

Abstract

Bioabsorbable implants can be advantageous for certain surgical tissue bioengineering applications and implant-assisted tissue repair. They offer the obvious benefits of nonpermanence and eventual restoration of the native tissue's biomechanical and immunological properties, while providing a structural scaffold for healing and a route for additional therapies (i.e., drug elution). They present unique developmental, imaging, and histopathological challenges in the conduct of preclinical animal studies and in interpretation of pathology data. The bioabsorption process is typically associated with a gradual decline (over months to years) in structural strength and integrity and may also be associated with cellular responses such as phagocytosis that may confound interpretation of efficacy and safety end points. Additionally, as these implants bioabsorb, they become increasingly difficult to isolate histologically and thus imaging modalities such as microCT become very valuable to determine the original location of the implants and to assess the remodeling response in tandem with histopathology. In this article, we will review different types of bioabsorbable implants and commonly used bioabsorbable materials; additionally, we will address some of the most common challenges and pitfalls confronting histologists and pathologists in collecting, handling, imaging, preparing tissues through histology, evaluating, and interpreting study data associated with bioabsorbable implants.

Keywords:  ISO 10993; bioabsorption; biomaterial; bioresorption; medical devices; pathology; preclinical studies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30700220     DOI: 10.1177/0192623318816681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biodegradable Bone Implants as a New Hope to Reduce Device-Associated Infections-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  José C C Paiva; Luís Oliveira; Maria Fátima Vaz; Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22

2.  Dendriplex-Impregnated Hydrogels With Programmed Release Rate.

Authors:  Evgeny Apartsin; Alya Venyaminova; Jean-Pierre Majoral; Anne-Marie Caminade
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Biodegradable magnesium fixation screw for barrier membranes used in guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Željka Perić Kačarević; Patrick Rider; Akiva Elad; Drazen Tadic; Daniel Rothamel; Gerrit Sauer; Fabien Bornert; Peter Windisch; Dávid Botond Hangyási; Balint Molnar; Till Kämmerer; Bernhard Hesse; Emely Bortel; Marco Bartosch; Frank Witte
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-02

Review 4.  Osteochondral tissue engineering: Perspectives for clinical application and preclinical development.

Authors:  Chengchong Ai; Yee Han Dave Lee; Xuan Hao Tan; Si Heng Sharon Tan; James Hoi Po Hui; James Cho-Hong Goh
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Quality control methods in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: from imaging to biosensors.

Authors:  Daniele Zuncheddu; Elena Della Bella; Andrea Schwab; Dalila Petta; Gaia Rocchitta; Silvia Generelli; Felix Kurth; Annapaola Parrilli; Sophie Verrier; Julietta V Rau; Marco Fosca; Margherita Maioli; Pier Andrea Serra; Mauro Alini; Heinz Redl; Sibylle Grad; Valentina Basoli
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 13.567

6.  CorNeat KPro: Ocular Implantation Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Gilad Litvin; Ido Klein; Yoav Litvin; Guy Klaiman; Abraham Nyska
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.152

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.