Literature DB >> 30700115

The influence of developmental spinal stenosis on the risk of re-operation on an adjacent segment after decompression-only surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

P W H Cheung1, H K Fong1, C S Wong1, J P Y Cheung1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) on the risk of re-operation at an adjacent level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 235 consecutive patients who had undergone decompression-only surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and had a minimum five-year follow-up. There were 106 female patients (45.1%) and 129 male patients (54.9%), with a mean age at surgery of 66.8 years (sd 11.3). We excluded those with adult deformity and spondylolisthesis. Presenting symptoms, levels operated on initially and at re-operation were studied. MRI measurements included the anteroposterior diameter of the bony spinal canal, the degree of disc degeneration, and the thickness of the ligamentum flavum. DSS was defined by comparative measurements of the bony spinal canal. Risk factors for re-operation at the adjacent level were determined and included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression for prediction modelling. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: Of the 235 patients, 21.7% required re-operation at an adjacent segment. Re-operation at an adjacent segment was associated with DSS (p = 0.026), the number of levels decompressed (p = 0.008), and age at surgery (p = 0.013). Multivariate regression model (p < 0.001) controlled for other confounders showed that DSS was a significant predictor of re-operation at an adjacent segment, with an adjusted OR of 3.93.
CONCLUSION: Patients with DSS who have undergone lumbar spinal decompression are 3.9 times more likely to undergo future surgery at an adjacent level. This is a poor prognostic indicator that can be identified prior to index decompression surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent level; Adjacent segment; Developmental spinal stenosis; Lumbar surgery; Reoperation; Risk factor

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30700115     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B2.BJJ-2018-1136.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

Review 1.  The importance of sagittal balance in adult scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

2.  Cost analysis comparison between conventional microsurgical decompression and full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Carlos King Ho Wong; Sin Ting Lau; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  Prevalence and Definition of Multilevel Lumbar Developmental Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Marcus Kin Long Lai; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23

4.  Relationship between Severity of Disease and Postoperative Neurological Recovery in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Combined with Developmental Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Jingtao Zhang; Shuo Peng; Junming Cao; Wei Du; Yu Zhang; Zhixin Gong; Li Zhang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.