| Literature DB >> 30699975 |
Guo-Qiang Kang1, Wen-Gui Duan2, Gui-Shan Lin3, You-Pei Yu4, Xiao-Yu Wang5, Sun-Zhong Lu6.
Abstract
A series of novelEntities:
Keywords: 3-caren-5-one oxime sulfonate; 3-carene; 3D-QSAR; Z-E stereoisomers; antifungal activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30699975 PMCID: PMC6384770 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24030477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of 3-caren-5-one oxime sulfonates (Z)-4a–4u and (E)-4v–4y.
Antifungal activity of the target compounds (Z)-4a–4u and (E)-4v–4y at 50 µg/mL.
| Compounds | Relative Inhibition Rate (%) against the Tested Fungi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ( | 74.2 | 35.7 | 34.4 | 29.2 | 5 | 17.5 |
| ( | 87.1 | 100 | 1.6 | 46.9 | 36.6 | 34 |
| ( | 9.7 | 7.1 | 27.9 | 23.3 | 20.8 | 13.4 |
| ( | 61.3 | 85.7 | 27.9 | 58.7 | 28.7 | 25.8 |
| ( | 48.4 | 92.9 | 27.9 | 42.4 | 36.6 | 17.5 |
| ( | 0 | 100 | 8.2 | 48.3 | 32.7 | 21.6 |
| ( | 22.6 | 0 | 0 | 35.1 | 24.8 | 29.9 |
| ( | 9.7 | 0 | 0 | 2.6 | 16.8 | 29.9 |
| ( | 74.2 | 0 | 8.2 | 0 | 12.9 | 13.4 |
| ( | 9.7 | 92.9 | 21.3 | 43.9 | 16.8 | 21.6 |
| ( | 0 | 0 | 1.6 | 23.3 | 20.8 | 25.8 |
| ( | 61.3 | 92.9 | 34.4 | 49.8 | 20.8 | 17.5 |
| ( | 0 | 100 | 27.9 | 23.3 | 20.8 | 25.8 |
| ( | 0 | 0 | 8.2 | 45.4 | 5 | 21.6 |
| ( | 48.4 | 14.3 | 8.2 | 20.3 | 12.9 | 29.9 |
| ( | 48.4 | 85.7 | 8.2 | 52.8 | 5 | 29.9 |
| ( | 22.6 | 0 | 14.8 | 17.3 | 12.9 | 13.4 |
| ( | 9.7 | 0 | 27.9 | 29.2 | 5 | 17.5 |
| ( | 16.1 | 42.9 | 1.6 | 52.8 | 5 | 17.5 |
| ( | 22.6 | 28.6 | 14.8 | 18.8 | 20.8 | 9.3 |
| ( | 9.7 | 64.3 | 21.3 | 24.7 | 5 | 17.5 |
| ( | 0 | 14.3 | 0 | 23.3 | 8.9 | 0 |
| ( | 0 | 42.9 | 21.3 | 29.2 | 20.8 | 9.3 |
| ( | 9.7 | 57.1 | 8.2 | 89.7 | 100 | 1 |
| ( | 0 | 92.9 | 27.9 | 100 | 100 | 9.3 |
| Chlorothanil | 73.3 | 75 | 73.9 | 96.1 | 90.4 | 91.3 |
The ED values of experimental and predicted activities.
| Compounds | ED | ED’’ | Residue |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | −3.60 | −3.61 | 0.01 |
| ( | −1.73 | −1.88 | 0.15 |
| ( | −1.39 | −1.44 | 0.05 |
| ( | −0.53 | −0.45 | −0.08 |
| ( | −4.51 | −4.61 | 0.10 |
| ( | −4.53 | −4.57 | 0.04 |
| ( | −1.41 | −1.23 | −0.18 |
| ( | −4.53 | −4.06 | −0.47 |
| ( | −1.45 | −1.50 | 0.05 |
| ( | −0.59 | −0.70 | 0.11 |
| ( | −4.58 | −4.62 | 0.04 |
| ( | −3.36 | −3.56 | 0.20 |
| ( | −1.77 | −1.71 | −0.06 |
| ( | −4.51 | −4.53 | 0.02 |
| ( | −4.52 | −4.53 | 0.01 |
| ( | −2.71 | −2.73 | 0.02 |
Summary of CoMFA Aanalysis.
| Contribution (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| q2 | r2 | S | F | Steric | Electrostatic | |
| CoMFA | 0.569 | 0.990 | 0.243 | 68.914 | 95.0 | 5.0 |
q2: cross-validated correlational coefficient, r2: non-validated correlational coefficient, S: standard error of estimate, F: the Fischer ratio.
Figure 1Predicted vs experimental ED values of CoMFA.
Figure 2Contours of CoMFA analysis: (2a) Contours of electrostatic contribution were represented in red and blue; (2b) Contours of steric contribution were represented in yellow and green.
Figure 3The proposed new molecules based on the established CoMFA model: (A) (Z)-3-Caren-5-one O-(3-nitro-4-methylbenzenesulfonyl) oxime; (B) (Z)-3-Caren-5-one O-(3-chloro-4-methylbenzenesulfonyl) oxime.
Figure 4The asterisk skeleton of title compounds.
Figure 5Superposition modes of compounds.