Taylor A Burke1, Brooke A Ammerman2, Ross Jacobucci2. 1. Temple University, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: taylor.burke@temple.edu. 2. University of Notre Dame, Department of Psychology, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Machine learning techniques offer promise to improve suicide risk prediction. In the current systematic review, we aimed to review the existing literature on the application of machine learning techniques to predict self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). METHOD: We systematically searched PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, ERIC, CINAHL, and MEDLINE for articles published through February 2018. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles met criteria to be included in the review. Included articles were reviewed by outcome: suicide death, suicide attempt, suicide plan, suicidal ideation, suicide risk, and non-suicidal self-injury. We observed three general aims in the use of SITB-focused machine learning analyses: (1) improving prediction accuracy, (2) identifying important model indicators (i.e., variable selection) and indicator interactions, and (3) modeling underlying subgroups. For studies with the aim of boosting predictive accuracy, we observed greater prediction accuracy of SITBs than in previous studies using traditional statistical methods. Studies using machine learning for variable selection purposes have both replicated findings of well-known SITB risk factors and identified novel variables that may augment model performance. Finally, some of these studies have allowed for subgroup identification, which in turn has helped to inform clinical cutoffs. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the current review include relatively low paper sample size, inconsistent reporting procedures resulting in an inability to compare model accuracy across studies, and lack of model validation on external samples. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that leveraging machine learning techniques to further predictive accuracy and identify novel indicators will aid in the prediction and prevention of suicide.
BACKGROUND: Machine learning techniques offer promise to improve suicide risk prediction. In the current systematic review, we aimed to review the existing literature on the application of machine learning techniques to predict self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). METHOD: We systematically searched PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, ERIC, CINAHL, and MEDLINE for articles published through February 2018. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles met criteria to be included in the review. Included articles were reviewed by outcome: suicide death, suicide attempt, suicide plan, suicidal ideation, suicide risk, and non-suicidal self-injury. We observed three general aims in the use of SITB-focused machine learning analyses: (1) improving prediction accuracy, (2) identifying important model indicators (i.e., variable selection) and indicator interactions, and (3) modeling underlying subgroups. For studies with the aim of boosting predictive accuracy, we observed greater prediction accuracy of SITBs than in previous studies using traditional statistical methods. Studies using machine learning for variable selection purposes have both replicated findings of well-known SITB risk factors and identified novel variables that may augment model performance. Finally, some of these studies have allowed for subgroup identification, which in turn has helped to inform clinical cutoffs. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the current review include relatively low paper sample size, inconsistent reporting procedures resulting in an inability to compare model accuracy across studies, and lack of model validation on external samples. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that leveraging machine learning techniques to further predictive accuracy and identify novel indicators will aid in the prediction and prevention of suicide.
Authors: Namik Kirlic; Elisabeth Akeman; Danielle C DeVille; Hung-Wen Yeh; Kelly T Cosgrove; Timothy J McDermott; James Touthang; Ashley Clausen; Martin P Paulus; Robin L Aupperle Journal: J Am Coll Health Date: 2021-07-22
Authors: Robert M Bossarte; Chris J Kennedy; Alex Luedtke; Matthew K Nock; Jordan W Smoller; Cara Stokes; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Philippe Mortier; Jordi Alonso; Randy P Auerbach; Jason Bantjes; Corina Benjet; Ronny Bruffaerts; Pim Cuijpers; David D Ebert; Jennifer Greif Green; Penelope Hasking; Eirini Karyotaki; Glenn Kiekens; Arthur Mak; Matthew K Nock; Siobhan O'Neill; Stephanie Pinder-Amaker; Nancy A Sampson; Dan J Stein; Gemma Vilagut; Chelsey Wilks; Alan M Zaslavsky; Patrick Mair; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: Gareth Harman; Dakota Kliamovich; Angelica M Morales; Sydney Gilbert; Deanna M Barch; Michael A Mooney; Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Damien A Fair; Bonnie J Nagel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240