Literature DB >> 30699446

Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Femoral-Popliteal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis from a Stratified Randomized Trial.

Clive Kearon1, Chu-Shu Gu2, Jim A Julian2, Samuel Z Goldhaber3, Anthony J Comerota4, Heather L Gornik5, Timothy P Murphy6, Laurence Lewis7, Susan R Kahn8, Andrei L Kindzelski9, Dennis Slater10, Randolph Geary11, Ronald Winokur12, Kannan Natarajan13, Alan Dietzek14, Daniel A Leung15, Stanley Kim16, Suresh Vedantham17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial reported that pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) did not reduce post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), but reduced moderate-to-severe PTS and the severity of PTS symptoms. In this analysis, we examine the effect of PCDT in patients with femoral-popliteal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (without involvement of more proximal veins). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within the ATTRACT trial, 300 patients had DVT involving the femoral vein without involvement of the common femoral or iliac veins and were randomized to receive PCDT with anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone (no PCDT). Patients were followed for 24 months.
RESULTS: From 6 to 24 months, between the PCDT versus no PCDT arms, there was: no difference in any PTS (Villalta scale ≥ 5: risk ratio [RR] = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.24); moderate-or-severe PTS (Villalta scale ≥ 10: RR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.57-1.52); severity of PTS scores; or general or disease-specific quality of life (p > 0.5 for all comparisons). From baseline to both 10 and 30 days, there was no difference in improvement of leg pain or swelling between treatment arms. From baseline to 10 days, major bleeding occurred in three versus none (p = 0.06) and any bleeding occurred in eight versus two (p = 0.032) PCDT versus no PCDT patients. Over 24 months, recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 16 PCDT and 12 no PCDT patients (p = 0.24).
CONCLUSION: In patients with femoral-popliteal DVT, PCDT did not improve short- or long-term efficacy outcomes, but it increased bleeding. Therefore, PCDT should not be used as initial treatment of femoral-popliteal DVT. (NCT00790335). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30699446     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  10 in total

1.  Relationships between the use of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis, sonographic findings, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute proximal DVT: Results from the ATTRACT Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ido Weinberg; Suresh Vedantham; Amber Salter; Gail Hadley; Noor Al-Hammadi; Clive Kearon; Jim A Julian; Mahmood K Razavi; Heather L Gornik; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Anthony J Comerota; Andrei L Kindzelski; Robert M Schainfeld; John F Angle; Sanjay Misra; Jonathan A Schor; Darren Hurst; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Standard Anticoagulation in Patients With Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Results From the ATTRACT Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Magnuson; Khaja Chinnakondepalli; Katherine Vilain; Clive Kearon; Jim A Julian; Susan R Kahn; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael R Jaff; Andrei L Kindzelski; Kevin Herman; Paul S Brady; Karun Sharma; Carl M Black; Suresh Vedantham; David J Cohen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-08

3.  Percutaneous endovenous intervention versus anticoagulation in the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guofu Hu; Jian Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

4.  Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Clinical Significance and Endovascular Interventions.

Authors:  Xin Li; Sasan Partovi; Sameer Gadani; Charles Martin; Avi Beck; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Dig Dis Interv       Date:  2020-09-22

5.  Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.

Authors:  Cathryn Broderick; Lorna Watson; Matthew P Armon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 6.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: 2021 update.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Khaja M Chinnakondepalli; David J Cohen; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Catheter-Based Therapies and Other Management Strategies for Deep Vein Thrombosis and Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.

Authors:  Siddhant Thukral; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Ultrasound-Accelerated Thrombolysis and Venoplasty for the Treatment of the Postthrombotic Syndrome: Results of the ACCESS PTS Study.

Authors:  Mark J Garcia; Keith M Sterling; Susan R Kahn; Anthony J Comerota; Michael R Jaff; Kenneth Ouriel; Ido Weinberg
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  National guidelines on the management of venous thromboembolism: Joint guideline of the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Phlebology Society.

Authors:  Ahmet Kürşat Bozkurt; Hakkı Tankut Akay; İsmet Tanzer Çalkavur; Mustafa Şırlak; Ozan Onur Balkanay; Emrah Uğuz; Suat Doğancı; Adil Polat; Serdar Bayrak; Şahin Bozok; Ahmet Barış Durukan; Nevzat Erdil; Dilek Erer; Şahin Şenay; Ertekin Utku Ünal; Soner Yavaş
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 0.332

10.  Clinical Outcomes of a Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Venous Thrombolysis Strategy that Included Rheolytic Thrombectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham; Amber Salter; Samantha Lancia; Lawrence Lewis; Siddhant Thukral; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.682

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.