| Literature DB >> 30699248 |
Tri Le1,2, Bo Peng2,3, Chunyang Su2, Arash Massoudieh1, Alba Torrents3, Ahmed Al-Omari2, Sudhir Murthy2, Bernhard Wett4, Kartik Chandran5, Christine DeBarbadillo2, Charles Bott6, Haydée De Clippeleir2.
Abstract
In this study, concurrent operation of anammox and partial denitrification within a nonacclimated mixed culture system was proposed. The impact of carbon sources (acetate, glycerol, methanol, and ethanol) and COD/NO3- -N ratio on partial denitrification selection under both short- and long-term operations was investigated. Results from short-term testing showed that all carbon sources supported partial denitrification. However, acetate and glycerol were preferred due to their display of efficient partial denitrification selection, which may be related to their different electron transport pathways in comparison with methanol. Long-term operation confirmed results of batch tests by showing the contribution of partial denitrification to nitrate removal above 90% after acclimation in both acetate and glycerol reactors. In contrast, methanol showed challenges of maintaining efficient partial denitrification. COD/NO3- -N ratio mainly controlled the rate of nitrate reduction and not directly partial denitrification selection; thus, it should be used to balance between denitrification rate and anammox rate. PRACTITIONER POINTS: The authors aimed to investigate the impact of carbon sources and COD/NO3-N ratio on partial denitrification selection. All the carbon sources supported partial denitrification as long as the nitrite sink was available. 90% partial denitrification could be achieved with both acetate and glycerol in long-term operations. COD/NO3-N ratio did not directly control partial denitrification but can be used to balance between denitrification rate and anammox rate.Entities:
Keywords: acetate; anammox; denitratation; final polishing; glycerol; methanol; shortcut nitrogen removal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30699248 DOI: 10.1002/wer.1016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Environ Res ISSN: 1061-4303 Impact factor: 1.946