Lukas Lenga1, Doris Leithner1,2, Julia L Peterke1, Moritz H Albrecht1, Tomas Gudauskas3, Tommaso D'Angelo1,4, Christian Booz1, Renate Hammerstingl1, Thomas J Vogl1, Simon S Martin1, Julian L Wichmann1. 1. 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Division of Experimental and Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 3. 3 Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 4. 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University Hospital Messina, Messina, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare radiation dose and image quality of single- and dual-energy CT (SECT, DECT) examinations of the chest in matched cohorts for second and third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 200 patients (100 men; mean age, 61.7 ± 14.8 years old; 100 women, mean age, 59.4 ± 15.1 years old), matched by sex and body mass index, who had undergone clinically indicated contrast-enhanced chest CT. Four study groups, each consisting of 50 patients, were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced chest CT was performed using vendor-preset second-generation DSCT (group A, 120-kV SECT; group C, 80/Sn140-kV DECT) or third-generation DSCT (group B, 90-kV SECT; group D, 90/Sn150-kV DECT) protocols. Radiation dose assessment was normalized to a scan range of 27.5 cm. Image quality was objectively analyzed using dose-independent figure-of-merit (FOM) contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations and subjectively evaluated by three independent radiologists. RESULTS: Direct comparison of effective radiation dose for second-generation DSCT groups A and C showed statistically significant lower radiation dose values for DECT compared with SECT acquisition (3.2 ± 1.2 mSv vs 2.3 ± 0.6 mSv, p ≤ 0.004), but differences between third-generation SECT and DECT were not significant (1.2 ± 0.9 mSv vs 1.3 ± 0.6 mSv, p = 0.412). FOM CNR analysis revealed highest values for third-generation DECT (p ≤ 0.043). Differences in subjective image quality between the four groups were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.179). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced DECT examinations of the chest can be performed routinely with second- and third-generation DSCT systems without either increased radiation exposure or decreased image quality compared with SECT acquisition.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare radiation dose and image quality of single- and dual-energy CT (SECT, DECT) examinations of the chest in matched cohorts for second and third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 200 patients (100 men; mean age, 61.7 ± 14.8 years old; 100 women, mean age, 59.4 ± 15.1 years old), matched by sex and body mass index, who had undergone clinically indicated contrast-enhanced chest CT. Four study groups, each consisting of 50 patients, were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced chest CT was performed using vendor-preset second-generation DSCT (group A, 120-kV SECT; group C, 80/Sn140-kV DECT) or third-generation DSCT (group B, 90-kV SECT; group D, 90/Sn150-kV DECT) protocols. Radiation dose assessment was normalized to a scan range of 27.5 cm. Image quality was objectively analyzed using dose-independent figure-of-merit (FOM) contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations and subjectively evaluated by three independent radiologists. RESULTS: Direct comparison of effective radiation dose for second-generation DSCT groups A and C showed statistically significant lower radiation dose values for DECT compared with SECT acquisition (3.2 ± 1.2 mSv vs 2.3 ± 0.6 mSv, p ≤ 0.004), but differences between third-generation SECT and DECT were not significant (1.2 ± 0.9 mSv vs 1.3 ± 0.6 mSv, p = 0.412). FOM CNR analysis revealed highest values for third-generation DECT (p ≤ 0.043). Differences in subjective image quality between the four groups were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.179). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced DECT examinations of the chest can be performed routinely with second- and third-generation DSCT systems without either increased radiation exposure or decreased image quality compared with SECT acquisition.
Authors: Petri Paakkari; Satu I Inkinen; Miitu K M Honkanen; Mithilesh Prakash; Rubina Shaikh; Miika T Nieminen; Mark W Grinstaff; Janne T A Mäkelä; Juha Töyräs; Juuso T J Honkanen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Moritz H Albrecht; Danilo Caudo; Silvio Mazziotti; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann; Simon Martin; Ibrahim Yel; Giorgio Ascenti; Vitali Koch; Giuseppe Cicero; Alfredo Blandino; Christian Booz Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2021-09-03